2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/7678613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of Waist Circumference Measurements at Five Different Anatomical Sites in Chinese Children

Abstract: This study compared the waist circumference (WC) measurements of Chinese children at different sites to determine the relationship between WC measurements and body fat. WC was measured at five sites in 255 subjects aged 9–19 years: immediately below the lowest rib (WC1), at the narrowest waist (WC2), the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest (WC3), 1 cm above the umbilicus (WC4), and immediately above the iliac crest (WC5). Body fat mass (FM), body fat percentage (% BF), body fat mass in the trun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this idea, the associations observed between the residuals and BMI provide a problem that, in both boys and girls, there might be a difference between Wumb and Wmin in the magnitude of their associations with total-body adiposity. However, this is canceled out by previous findings indicating that, in children [ 18 ] and adults [ 19 ] of both sexes, the magnitude of the association between waist circumference and the total-body fat mass is independent of the site where waist circumference is determined, although the absolute values of the waist circumference differ between the sites. In any case, the current results suggest that, as a practical issue, the use of Wumb and Wmin for boys and girls, respectively, enables assessment of the total-body SMV without influence of BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this idea, the associations observed between the residuals and BMI provide a problem that, in both boys and girls, there might be a difference between Wumb and Wmin in the magnitude of their associations with total-body adiposity. However, this is canceled out by previous findings indicating that, in children [ 18 ] and adults [ 19 ] of both sexes, the magnitude of the association between waist circumference and the total-body fat mass is independent of the site where waist circumference is determined, although the absolute values of the waist circumference differ between the sites. In any case, the current results suggest that, as a practical issue, the use of Wumb and Wmin for boys and girls, respectively, enables assessment of the total-body SMV without influence of BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Furtheremore, the present studies determined WCs at two different sites. As described earlier, the magnitude of waist circumference varies with its measurement site [ 17 , 18 ]. These aspects suggest that regression equation in the relationship between BM/W and total-body skeletal muscle volume would differ with race examined and measurement site adopted for waist circumference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is no international agreement or a standard for accepted waist circumference cutoff values (which vary depending on age, sex, ethnicity, and race) for defining abdominal obesity among children and adolescents. Different WC measurement methods can result in different WC values 57 . During childhood and adolescence, the growth rates differ due to various factors (sex, age, the onset of puberty, and other factors), WC and height may increase differently and not in parallel within a subject, and the WHtR ratio changes and varies during these periods of growth and development 58 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at present, there is no consensus regarding the standard technique and location of measurement for WC. Waist circumference is affected substantially by measurement technique and locations of WC measurement [2325]. Position, meals, and respiration could all affect the measurement of WC [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%