Comparisons of the Nottingham Health Profile and the SF-36 health survey for the assessment of quality of life in individuals with chronic stroke

Cabral, Dinalva Lacerda; Laurentino, Glória Elizabeth Carneiro; Damascena, Caroline Guimarães; Faria, Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais; Melo, Priscilla Gonçalves de; Teixeira-Salmela, Luci Fuscaldi

doi:10.1590/s1413-35552012005000029

Cited by 18 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Several studies conducted in different populations show that the similar subscales of the NHP and the SF‐36 assess QOL differently . This is a result of individual and disease‐specific differences as well as the varied effects of the disease on patients' QOL.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of quality of life in haemodialysis patients: A comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and the Short Form 36

Zengin

Ören

Gül

et al. 2013

Int J of Nursing Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to compare the psychometric properties of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which evaluates health-related quality of life in haemodialysis patients. Data were gathered using the NHP and the SF-36. Quality of life scores obtained from the NHP and the SF-36 were compared according to sociodemographic characteristics. It was found that the internal consistency values of the NHP and the SF-36 were similar. The floor effect of the two NHP subscales and the ceiling effect of all the NHP subscales were higher than those pertaining to the. It was observed that the NHP mean subscale scores were higher than those of the SF-36, except for one subscale of the SF-36. There was a significant positive correlation between the similar subscales of the NHP and the SF-36 and between the total scores. These results seem to support the utility of the NHP and the SF-36 in evaluating quality of life in haemodialysis patients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cabral et al . conducted a study in stroke patients and found that the NHP attribute more negative value to functional capacity and pain than the SF‐36 . Wann–Hanson investigated QOL in lower limb ischemia patients and reported that the P and PM subscales of the NHP yield more negative results (worse QOL) than the SF‐36 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of quality of life in haemodialysis patients: A comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and the Short Form 36

Zengin

Ören

Gül

et al. 2013

Int J of Nursing Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Regarding convergent validity, the first test used was the correlation coefficient, employed in previous researches that sought to evaluate this property 6,[8][9][10][11][14][15][16][17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25] . The literature registered repeatedly, low convergence between social domains of SF-36 and NHP 8,[14][15][16][17][18][19]21,24,25 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such instruments are alike in several aspects 8,9 and are considered by the scientific community as replaceable each other. However, there were doubts regarding the agreement of their social domains 6,8,10,11 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Agreement of NHP and Sf-36 Social Domains: An Exploratory Study

Alencar

Souza

Sá

2017

BJMHH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) is an important outcome measure to investigate and monitor patients with chronic diseases. In order to achieve such goal, it is essential to choose an appropriate tool to evaluate the peculiarities of each population. Instruments to investigate HRQoL, NHP and SF-36 are alike in several aspects and are considered by the scientific community as replaceable each other. However, there are doubts regarding the agreement of their social domains. Objective: The present study aim to assess whether the social domains of the NHP and SF-36 correspond when applied in a population with chronic disease. Methods: The present research was made by applying the two instruments to a population with chronic disease. The social domains agreement was evaluated by Pearson correlation, ROC curve, AUC, Youdex Index, and Bland-Altman plot. Results: It was achieve a weak correlation between the two social domais (r = 0.3), confirmed by ROC curve with small AUC (0.416) and Youdex Index around 0.0. The Bland-Altman plot reaffirmed the no agreement between the two subscale by achieving mean difference equal to 29.37 (± 38.51), which made the concordance Interval vary from 106.39 to -47.65. Conclusion: it was concluded that social domains of NHP and SF-36 do not agree to each other. However, reasons for that are not explained and need to be investigated in futures studies. The current research was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health under the protocol CAAE 516.42315.5.0000.5544.

show abstract

“…Cuenta con 38 ítems distribuidos en 6 dominios los cuales son: energía, dolor, reacciones emocionales, sueño, aislamiento social y movilidad física. Es una encuesta autoadministrada con respuesta dicotómica (sí o no) que tarda en ser respondida entre 5 y 10 minutos, con puntaje que va de 0 a 100, donde el primero indica mejor salud; considerada como alternativa al SF-36 para diseño de intervenciones terapéuticas y estandarizarlas como medidas de salud pública 23,24 .…”

Section: Perfil De Salud De Nottingham (Nhp)unclassified

Escalas utilizadas para la medición de la calidad de vida en pacientes con enfermedad cerebrovascular

Saavedra

Gómez²

2016

Rev Col Med Fis Reh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMENLa enfermedad cerebrovascular se incrementa cada día con una incidencia global de 258/100.000 y con un aumento en las cifras de supervivientes que pasaron de 17,9 millones en 1990 a 33 millones en 2010; constituye una de las patologías que mayor impacto generan en la calidad de vida de los supervivientes, creando la necesidad de que esta sea evaluada, medida y tenida en cuenta para estudios de investigación, para generación de políticas públicas en salud y para crear estrategias de manejo que se adecúen a las necesidades expresadas por los pacientes.Palabras clave: accidente cerebrovascular, calidad de vida, rehabilitación, servicios de salud para personas con discapacidad. ABSTRACTCerebrovascular disease increases every day with an overall incidence of 258 / 100,000. The number of survivors increased from 17.9 million in 1990 to 33 million in 2010, is one of the pathologies that generate greater impact on quality of life survivors, that is why exists the need to evaluate, measure and take the quality of life into account in research studies to generate public health policies and to create strategies of management to the needs expressed by patients.

show abstract

Comparisons of the Nottingham Health Profile and the SF-36 health survey for the assessment of quality of life in individuals with chronic stroke

Cited by 18 publications

References 25 publications

Assessment of quality of life in haemodialysis patients: A comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and the Short Form 36

Assessment of quality of life in haemodialysis patients: A comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and the Short Form 36

Agreement of NHP and Sf-36 Social Domains: An Exploratory Study

Escalas utilizadas para la medición de la calidad de vida en pacientes con enfermedad cerebrovascular

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About