22nd Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference 1991
DOI: 10.2514/6.1991-1677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of numerical and exact solutions for oblique detonationswith structure

Abstract: Numerical predictions of the two-dimensional, inviscid, supersonic, reactive flow of a calorically perfect ideal gas over a straight wedge are compared with the predictions of a linear asymptotic model valid in the hypersonic limit. Solution features predicted by the asymptotic model include a curved shock attached to the wedge tip, a reaction layer parallel to the shock, and a vorticity layer parallel to the wedge surface. For sufficiently high Mach number and heat release, the numerical model predicts simila… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar agreement and disagreement are found when reaction progress and vorticity contours are compared. 3 In this and all cases, the domain is sufficiently large such that the flow has nearly completely relaxed to the equilibrium, irrotational state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar agreement and disagreement are found when reaction progress and vorticity contours are compared. 3 In this and all cases, the domain is sufficiently large such that the flow has nearly completely relaxed to the equilibrium, irrotational state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As shown in detail in Ref. 3, as Mach number is held fixed and q is lowered, numerical errors overwhelm the effects of heat release so that the differences are primarily attributable to truncation errors in the numerical method.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation