1992
DOI: 10.2514/3.11653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of numerical oblique detonation solutions with an asymptotic benchmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an effort to better relate these models to propulsion applications, Powers and Gonthier, 1992b, give a methodology to study of the configuration of Figure 7 along with a simple, non-rigorous anal- Grismer and Powers, 1992. ysis. The analysis divides the flow into six zones: 1) a pre-shocked region, 2) a post-shocked region, 3) a Prandtl-Meyer rarefaction region, 4) a post-rarefaction region, 5) a post-flame sheet region, and 6) a post-shock region.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an effort to better relate these models to propulsion applications, Powers and Gonthier, 1992b, give a methodology to study of the configuration of Figure 7 along with a simple, non-rigorous anal- Grismer and Powers, 1992. ysis. The analysis divides the flow into six zones: 1) a pre-shocked region, 2) a post-shocked region, 3) a Prandtl-Meyer rarefaction region, 4) a post-rarefaction region, 5) a post-flame sheet region, and 6) a post-shock region.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent analyses which this author and colleagues have performed have placed emphasis on oblique detonations with resolved reaction zone structure and the connections of these structures with the predictions of a RH analysis: (Powers and Stewart, 1992), (Powers and Gonthier, 1992a), and (Grismer and Powers, 1992). In addition, there is a new large body of general unsteady analyses of one-and two-dimensional detonations which though germane, have largely not been applied in propulsion studies, e.g.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work by Powers and Stewart, two solutions were presented: a straight wedge supporting a curved shock and a curved wedge supporting a straight shock. Grismer and Powers [26] used the straight wedge, curved shock solution to compare a numerical solution algorithm to the analytical solution. Grismer and Powers intent was to demonstrate the use of these analytical solutions as an aid to code development.…”
Section: Oblique Detonation Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent analyses which this author and colleagues have performed have placed emphasis on oblique detonations with resolvpd reaction zone structure and the connections of these structures with the predictions of a RH analysis: , Powprs and Gonthier (1992a), and Grismer and Powers (1992). In addition, there is a new large body of general unsteady analyses of one-and twodimensional detonations which though germane, have largely not been applied in propulsion studies, e.g.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11: DinH'nsionless pressure contours predicted by asymptotic and numerical analysis, from Grismer and Powers (1992). Though they cannot serve as a substitute for either comprehensive models or experiments (both of which have their difficulties), they can be useful guides for understanding.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%