2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of dN/dS are time dependent for closely related bacterial genomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

47
369
6
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(430 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
47
369
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The identity of the SNPs suggests that they reflect recent diversification without evidence for either purifying or positive selection (14). Specifically, the SNPs are not biased toward protein-altering substitutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The identity of the SNPs suggests that they reflect recent diversification without evidence for either purifying or positive selection (14). Specifically, the SNPs are not biased toward protein-altering substitutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A possible explanation for these high ratios is that the genes were acquired recently and are still in the process of adaptation to their new context. Unusually high dN/dS ratios have also been observed in other closely related strains (Rocha et al, 2006) as a result of paralog formation, that is, recent gene duplications in which one gene undergoes a process of neo-or sub-functionalization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…dN/dS was calculated for concatenated alignments of CDSs from the nonrepetitive, core genome for each pairwise combination of 9 isolates (630, BI-9, CF5, M68, M120, CD196, BI-1, 2007855, and R20291). It was previously suggested when effective population size is infinite or sufficiently large; the trajectory of 1/(dN/dS) exhibits a linear trend with time, but when population size decreases, the increase of 1/(dN/dS) with time reaches a plateau (29). S (number of synonymous substitutions) or dI (number of intergenic SNPs) have been used as a measure of time since divergence, although synonymous changes and intergenic regions could also be subject to selection forces that deviate from neutral.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A ratio significantly smaller than 1 suggests strong purifying selection, whereas a ratio close to 1 is usually taken as indicating a neutral selection pressure. However, it has been shown that for very closely related genomes, dN/dS can be close to 1 (29), either because time has been too short for selection to act (29) or because nucleotide substitutions within a species may represent segregating polymorphisms rather than fixed differences (30). dN/dS was calculated for concatenated alignments of CDSs from the nonrepetitive, core genome for each pairwise combination of 9 isolates (630, BI-9, CF5, M68, M120, CD196, BI-1, 2007855, and R20291).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%