2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(01)00067-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of concrete-encased composite column strength provisions of ACI code and AISC specification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Each load factor is associated with a different instability pattern, but typically the lowest load factor is of interest. The Buckling mode shapes do not represent actual displacement but it helps to visualize the deformation part while buckling [6] . The buckling analysis is used to determine the specific set of loads which cause buckling and to find the shape of the buckling mode.…”
Section: Buckling Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each load factor is associated with a different instability pattern, but typically the lowest load factor is of interest. The Buckling mode shapes do not represent actual displacement but it helps to visualize the deformation part while buckling [6] . The buckling analysis is used to determine the specific set of loads which cause buckling and to find the shape of the buckling mode.…”
Section: Buckling Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not at all simple to define the stiffness and bearing capacity of composite structural elements and the complexity is due to the concrete's anisotropic characteristics. Design codes [1][2] propose simplified methodologies for defining these stiffness parameters and full yield curve that can either approximate or hold off the actual behavior of the structure [3]. One alternative for obtaining accurate results in a way that is more computationally feasible is the Refined Plastic Hinge Method (RPHM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in order to prevent the premature collapse of the concrete in the element, the steel strain of the profile and reinforcements shall also be limited to this value [18]. Weng and Yen [19] investigated the differences between the approaches of code ACI 318 [20] and AISC/LRFD [16] for the design of composite steel-concrete columns fully encased with concrete and evaluated how their results were close to the responses of a real column. This was confirmed by a series of statistical comparisons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational package developed is called MDCOMP (2014) and was implemented in FORTRAN language. Results obtained using MDCOMP (2014) are compared with the responses defined by Part 1.1 of Eurocode 4 [2], which is one of the most important codes used to design this type of structural element, and also with the answers presented in the works of Saw and Liew [17], Weng and Yen [19] and Naka et al [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%