2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2012.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons between the Urgonian platform carbonates from eastern Serbia (Carpatho-Balkanides) and northeast Iran (Kopet-Dagh Basin): Depositional facies, microfacies, biostratigraphy, palaeoenvironments and palaeoecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biomicrite sedimentation is testimony to transgression, when clastic sediment supply from land areas were blocked leading to deposition of carbonates in subtidal conditions (Pratt and James, 1992;Carevic et al, 2013). As a result, the carbonates were deposited only during the early Triassic as Neo-Tethys Ocean recovered from marine regression and seawater inundated the basin.…”
Section: Early Triassic Marine Transgression and Carbonate Depositionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The biomicrite sedimentation is testimony to transgression, when clastic sediment supply from land areas were blocked leading to deposition of carbonates in subtidal conditions (Pratt and James, 1992;Carevic et al, 2013). As a result, the carbonates were deposited only during the early Triassic as Neo-Tethys Ocean recovered from marine regression and seawater inundated the basin.…”
Section: Early Triassic Marine Transgression and Carbonate Depositionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Its cooccurrence with Balkhania balkhanica and Kopetdagaria sphaerica is highly expected (see Schlagintweit et al, 2013a). From a paleogeographic perspective, the Kopet Dagh basin is integrated in the Carpathian-Cimmerian province (Taherpour Khalil Abad et al, 2013).…”
Section: Remarks On Selected Microfossilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on micropaleontological assemblages, the carbona-te deposits of the Tirgan Formation were attributed to the Barremian-lower Aptian by the vast majority of previous authors who studied these limestones. Numerous sections were sampled from West to East across the Kopet Dagh basin, over the entire outcrop surface of the Tirgan Formation (Taherpour Khalil Abad et al, 2009;2010;Javanbakht et al, 2011;Carević et al, 2013;Taherpour Khalil Abad et al, 2013;Molaei et al, 2017;Yavarmanesh et al, 2017;Javanbakht et al, 2018). Surveying the previously figured micropaleontological assemblages shows that in many of these publications, several species were incorrectly identified (e.g., Carević et al, 2013;Molaei et al, 2017, Yavarmanesh et al, 2017, with the notable exception of the work of Taherpour Khalil 2010; (2017), the basal part of this formation may comprise the Berriasian-Hauterivian, or even part of the upper Tithonian.…”
Section: The Age Of the Tirgan Formation And The Lower Cretaceous Diamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fenestral fabrics are important to Sedimentologists because they normally indicate peritidal deposition and sedimentation, which essentially occurs at sea level (Scholle and Ulmer-Scholle, 2003). Fenestral structures indicate low energy shallow water (Carević et al, 2013), and subsequent exposure in a tidal flat environment (Hardie, 1977). Horizontal fenestrae and fenestral structures are reported in recent supratidal sediments, which result from desiccation and shrinkage of lime mud during prolonged exposure (Shinn, 1968a;Shinn et al, 1969).…”
Section: Facies Iii: Fenestral Mudstone/packstonementioning
confidence: 99%