1976
DOI: 10.1021/ac50002a031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons between the luminol light standards and a new method for absolute calibrations of light detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when H 2 O 2 was further increased to 5 × 10 −3 M , the quantum yield decreased to 1.0(±0.17)%. As discussed below, the optimized quantum yield of 1.23(±0.20)% in the present experiment shows very good agreement with the value of 1.24% determined by the majority of previous related reports (9–18). We do not go into more detailed H 2 O 2 ‐concentration dependence or microscopic chemical mechanisms for the dependence, which is beyond the purpose of this paper.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when H 2 O 2 was further increased to 5 × 10 −3 M , the quantum yield decreased to 1.0(±0.17)%. As discussed below, the optimized quantum yield of 1.23(±0.20)% in the present experiment shows very good agreement with the value of 1.24% determined by the majority of previous related reports (9–18). We do not go into more detailed H 2 O 2 ‐concentration dependence or microscopic chemical mechanisms for the dependence, which is beyond the purpose of this paper.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Quantum yields of popular bio/chemiluminescence reaction systems such as firefly (1), cypridina (2), aequorin (3–5), bacteria (6–8) and luminol (9) were mostly reported in 1960–1970. Luminol chemiluminescence was later reexamined by other elaborate methods (10–18) and is now often used as one of the secondary light standards (17–19) in quantitative luminescence measurements. In each of these experiments, however, the absolute sensitivity of each detector had to be calibrated with a standard of light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blue fluorescence protein was routinely assayed by its fluorescence intensity at 470 nm when excited at 420 nm, with an Aminco-Bowman Spectrofluorimeter. Luciferase activity was determined with a digital photometer, designed and constructed by G. J. Faini, which was calibrated for absolute photon sensitivity with the luminol chemiluminescence reaction as a light standard (22); This standard is directly traceable to the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) Lamp (23) and its calibration has been confirmed by three independent methods (24)(25)(26). NADH dehydrogenase was purified from P. fischeri 399 by C. White.and coupled efficiently with all types of luciferases used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus +cL for the luminol oxidation has been measured for radiometry using a light source comprised of a mixture of scintillators in a 14C labelled solvent (Hastings and Weber, 1963) and several spectrometric methods including calibrated spectroradiometers and photomultipliers (Lee and Seliger, 1972;Roberts and Hirt, 1967;Rauhut et al, 1966), matching of corrected and uncorrected spectra with that of a standard lamp viewed through filter combinations (band emission approximation method) (Lee and Seliger, 1965), and an integrating sphere detector with a quantum counter (Bezman and Faulkner, 1971;Michael and Faulkner, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the quantum yields of many chemiluminescent reactions have been measured (Mellor and Richter, 1974) the oxidation of luminol appears to be the only reaction that has been widely used and tested (Hastings and Weber, 1963;Seliger, 1965, 1972;Roberts and Hirt, 1967;Rauhut et al, 1966;Bezman and Faulkner, 1971). Thus +cL for the luminol oxidation has been measured for radiometry using a light source comprised of a mixture of scintillators in a 14C labelled solvent (Hastings and Weber, 1963) and several spectrometric methods including calibrated spectroradiometers and photomultipliers (Lee and Seliger, 1972;Roberts and Hirt, 1967;Rauhut et al, 1966), matching of corrected and uncorrected spectra with that of a standard lamp viewed through filter combinations (band emission approximation method) (Lee and Seliger, 1965), and an integrating sphere detector with a quantum counter (Bezman and Faulkner, 1971;Michael and Faulkner, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%