2015
DOI: 10.15439/2015f266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons between 2D and 3D Uniform Array Antennas

Abstract: Abstract-For any wireless communications antenna system becomes indispensable. In this paper we analyzed linear array, planar array and three -dimensional (3D) array antennas. The array systems are simulated in Matlab based on uniform linear array antennas. Comparisons between planar array antenna and 3D array antenna are provided take into account different phases of currents injected in antenna elements. Also we propose to use the array antenna in WSN due to the advantages in signal to noise ratio and power … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the term planar to indicate that the array can scan the beam along the elevation plane θ and the azimuth plane ϕ as opposed to the linear arrays that scan the main beam only along θ or ϕ [21]. Planar arrays offer more gain and lower sidelobes than linear arrays at the expense of using more elements [22].…”
Section: The Massive Mimo Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We use the term planar to indicate that the array can scan the beam along the elevation plane θ and the azimuth plane ϕ as opposed to the linear arrays that scan the main beam only along θ or ϕ [21]. Planar arrays offer more gain and lower sidelobes than linear arrays at the expense of using more elements [22].…”
Section: The Massive Mimo Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, a URPA is a two-dimensional matrix filled with a certain number of antenna elements (the circles in the figure) both along the x-and y-axis; these antenna elements are equally spaced between any successive pair of elements and this spacing is usually expressed in wavelengths. If we denote the number of elements placed on the x-axis with M (the rows of the matrix) and with N the number of antennas lying in the y-axis (the columns of the matrix), the total number of elements of the URPA is given by [22]:…”
Section: Massive Mimo Urpamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper analyzed various array geometries such as uniform linear (LA), uniform rectangular (PA), and circular arrays (CA). The LA has excellent direct and narrowest main beam lobe in a wanted direction, but in all azimuthal directions it does not work equally well, a major drawback of the PA is the question of presence on the opposite side of an additional large lobe of the same strength [6] the symmetry of the CA structure provides an obvious benefit since, it has no edge components, without a major change in the beamform, directional patterns synthesized with a CA can be rotated electronically in the array plane [7]. Many algorithms have been introduced to applicants on SA [8,9], one of the most public algorithms is least mean square (LMS) A commonly employed algorithm due to its low computational complexity and ease of implementation [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The favorable propagation offers a mutual orthogonality between channel vectors from different mobile terminals (MTs); hence, the application of linear signal processing techniques at the receiver side can result in optimal performance 4,7 . The antenna elements may be arranged in different structures and generate a radiation pattern according to its structure 8 . The majority of the works consider a uniform linear array (ULA) structure; however, only 2D or 3D structures such as uniform planar array (UPA) and uniform cylindrical array (UCA) offer control of angle of elevation, resulting in an increase of spatial resolution, that is, an increasing on the desired signal strength while simultaneously provide reduction in users' interference 9 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%