2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-014-1087-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Theorems for Gibbs Measures

Abstract: The Dobrushin comparison theorem is a powerful tool to bound the difference between the marginals of high-dimensional probability distributions in terms of their local specifications. Originally introduced to prove uniqueness and decay of correlations of Gibbs measures, it has been widely used in statistical mechanics as well as in the analysis of algorithms on random fields and interacting Markov chains. However, the classical comparison theorem requires validity of the Dobrushin uniqueness criterion, essenti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since one can obtain contraction estimates for Markov kernels using Wasserstein matrices, it is natural to ask whether Chatterjee's result can be derived as a special case of a more general method, which would let us freely choose an arbitrary Markov kernel K that leaves µ invariant and control the constants in the resulting concentration inequality by means of a judicious choice of a Wasserstein matrix for K. Such a method would most likely rely on general comparison theorems for Gibbs measures [31].…”
Section: Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since one can obtain contraction estimates for Markov kernels using Wasserstein matrices, it is natural to ask whether Chatterjee's result can be derived as a special case of a more general method, which would let us freely choose an arbitrary Markov kernel K that leaves µ invariant and control the constants in the resulting concentration inequality by means of a judicious choice of a Wasserstein matrix for K. Such a method would most likely rely on general comparison theorems for Gibbs measures [31].…”
Section: Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of the BPF is (N |K| ∞ card K) per time step where |K| ∞ := max K∈K card K. Under strong mixing assumptions, [13], [25] show that local errors ofπ N t,BPF are bounded uniformly in t and V .…”
Section: Blocked Particle Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Model ( m,p t ,g t ), defined in Subsection B, represents the asymptotic target distribution of the BPF as stated in [25]. It defines a joint smoothing distribution Q T and filtersπ t .…”
Section: A Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The general characterization that we give to ∂x (b)i ∂ba (Theorem 2.1 below) can be interpreted as a first instance of comparison theorems for constrained optimization procedures, along the lines of the comparison theorems established in probability theory to capture stochastic decay of correlation and control the difference of high-dimensional distributions (see [8] and [3]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%