This paper provides an introduction to quantum filtering theory. An introduction to quantum probability theory is given, focusing on the spectral theorem and the conditional expectation as a least squares estimate, and culminating in the construction of Wiener and Poisson processes on the Fock space. We describe the quantum Itô calculus and its use in the modelling of physical systems. We use both reference probability and innovations methods to obtain quantum filtering equations for system-probe models from quantum optics.
Abstract-Feedback control of quantum mechanical systems must take into account the probabilistic nature of quantum measurement. We formulate quantum feedback control as a problem of stochastic nonlinear control by considering separately a quantum filtering problem and a state feedback control problem for the filter. We explore the use of stochastic Lyapunov techniques for the design of feedback controllers for quantum spin systems and demonstrate the possibility of stabilizing one outcome of a quantum measurement with unit probability.Index Terms-Lyapunov functions, quantum filtering, quantum mechanics, quantum probability, stochastic nonlinear control.
The discovery of particle filtering methods has enabled the use of nonlinear filtering in a wide array of applications. Unfortunately, the approximation error of particle filters typically grows exponentially in the dimension of the underlying model. This phenomenon has rendered particle filters of limited use in complex data assimilation problems. In this paper, we argue that it is often possible, at least in principle, to develop local particle filtering algorithms whose approximation error is dimension-free. The key to such developments is the decay of correlations property, which is a spatial counterpart of the much better understood stability property of nonlinear filters. For the simplest possible algorithm of this type, our results provide under suitable assumptions an approximation error bound that is uniform both in time and in the model dimension. More broadly, our results provide a framework for the investigation of filtering problems and algorithms in high dimension.Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/14-AAP1061 in the Annals of Applied Probability (http://www.imstat.org/aap/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
Abstract. No quantum measurement can give full information on the state of a quantum system; hence any quantum feedback control problem is neccessarily one with partial observations, and can generally be converted into a completely observed control problem for an appropriate quantum filter as in classical stochastic control theory. Here we study the properties of controlled quantum filtering equations as classical stochastic differential equations. We then develop methods, using a combination of geometric control and classical probabilistic techniques, for global feedback stabilization of a class of quantum filters around a particular eigenstate of the measurement operator.Key words. quantum feedback control, quantum filtering equations, stochastic stabilization AMS subject classifications. 81P15, 81V80, 93D15, 93E151. Introduction. Though they are both probabilistic theories, probability theory and quantum mechanics have historically developed along very different lines. Nonetheless the two theories are remarkably close, and indeed a rigorous development of quantum probability [18] contains classical probability theory as a special case. The embedding of classical into quantum probability has a natural interpretation that is central to the idea of a quantum measurement: any set of commuting quantum observables can be represented as random variables on some probability space, and conversely any set of random variables can be encoded as commuting observables in a quantum model. The quantum probability model then describes the statistics of any set of measurements that we are allowed to make, whereas the sets of random variables obtained from commuting observables describe measurements that can be performed in a single realization of an experiment. As we are not allowed to make noncommuting observations in a single realization, any quantum measurement yields even in principle only partial information about the system.The situation in quantum feedback control [10,11] is thus very close to classical stochastic control with partial observations [3]. A typical quantum control scenario, representative of experiments in quantum optics, is shown in Fig. 1.1. We wish to control the state of a cloud of atoms, e.g. we could be interested in controlling their collective angular momentum. To observe the atoms, we scatter a laser probe field off the atoms and measure the scattered light using a homodyne detector (a cavity can be used to increase the interaction strength between the light and the atoms). The observation process is fed into a controller which can feed back a control signal to the atoms through some actuator, e.g. a time-varying magnetic field. The entire setup can be described by a Schrödinger equation for the atoms and the probe field, which takes the form of a "quantum stochastic differential equation" in a Markovian limit. The controller, however, only has access to the observations of the probe. The laser probe itself contributes quantum fluctuations to the observations, hence the observation process can be ...
We provide a general construction of time-consistent sublinear expectations on the space of continuous paths. It yields the existence of the conditional G-expectation of a Borel-measurable (rather than quasi-continuous) random variable, a generalization of the random Gexpectation, and an optional sampling theorem that holds without exceptional set. Our results also shed light on the inherent limitations to constructing sublinear expectations through aggregation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.