2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison study of MPM and SPH in modeling hypervelocity impact problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another effective and simple method to treat fracture in meshfree methods is the material point method (MPM) [212]. The advantage of the MPM over most SPH methods for fracture is their computational efficiency [213]. While those methods are quite attractive to model dynamic fracture and fragmentation involving an enormous amount of cracks, they are not well suited for static fracture with few cracks due to their less accurate representation of the crack kinematics.…”
Section: Meshfree Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another effective and simple method to treat fracture in meshfree methods is the material point method (MPM) [212]. The advantage of the MPM over most SPH methods for fracture is their computational efficiency [213]. While those methods are quite attractive to model dynamic fracture and fragmentation involving an enormous amount of cracks, they are not well suited for static fracture with few cracks due to their less accurate representation of the crack kinematics.…”
Section: Meshfree Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These Lagrangian particles carry all material information and track the deformation history. The momentums equations are solved on a predefined background grid, which can be fixed in space or arbitrarily defined, and provide an Eulerian description of the material domain (Ma et al, 2009). Compared with SPH, MPM owns higher accuracy, better computational stability and lower computational time consuming.…”
Section: D Pcmm In Cdemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, SPH and its improved versions have been successfully applied in many fields, such as free surface fluid flow (Cleary et al, 2006), hypervelocity impact (Michel et al, 2006) and progressive failure of geological body (Ma et al, 2011a, b). However, due to the normalization and compact of kernel function, some errors will occur when particles locate on or near the boundaries (Ma et al, 2009), although there are some methods to solve the problem (Campbell, 1989;Randles and Libersky, 2000). Furthermore, SPH converts the integration over the support domain into a summation only over a finite number of particles, so insufficient sampling points for integration may result in numerical instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of modifying shape functions is also used in meshfree method for modeling hypervelocity impact problems [9]. Many attempts have been made in recent years to extend this feature to shell structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%