Cocrystals of biologically
active molecular compounds have potential
utility in drug products thanks to their effect upon physicochemical
properties such as aqueous solubility. The fact that control of cocrystallization
can be more challenging than crystallization of single-component crystals
means that systematic studies that address the methodology of cocrystal
screening, production, and purification are a topical subject. We
previously reported a comparison of slow evaporation vs mechanochemistry
for a library of 25 molecular cocrystals. Herein, we compare the previously
reported mechanochemistry results (solvent-drop grinding (SDG) with
eight solvents) with new results obtained from slurrying in five preferred
solvents using the same library of 25 cocrystals. Overall, both methods
were found to be effective with slurrying and SDG being 94 and 78.5%
successful, respectively. Importantly, 96% of the cocrystals formed
via slurrying were observed to be free of starting materials (coformers)
according to powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), whereas this was the
case for only 72% of the cocrystals prepared by SDG. Slurrying therefore
compared favorably with mechanochemistry, which tends to leave small
amounts of unreacted coformer(s) as byproducts, and solution crystallization,
which often affords crystals of the least soluble coformer because
it can be difficult to control the saturation of three or more solids.
Perhaps the most interesting and surprising result of this study was
that water slurrying proved to be highly effective, even for low-solubility
coformers. Indeed, water slurrying was found to be effective for 21
of the 25 cocrystals studied.