1995
DOI: 10.1016/0190-9622(95)90349-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of wound closure by means of dog ear repair and elliptical excision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, our results do not correspond particularly well with a previous report mentioning the benefits of excision with dog ear repair [11], in which the number of dog ears was found to be in proportion to the final length of the wound. The reason for this is that some defects after tumor marginal excisions are not circular, but have an irregular shape according to the tumor margin.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Interestingly, our results do not correspond particularly well with a previous report mentioning the benefits of excision with dog ear repair [11], in which the number of dog ears was found to be in proportion to the final length of the wound. The reason for this is that some defects after tumor marginal excisions are not circular, but have an irregular shape according to the tumor margin.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Only a few studies have evaluated the results of routine elliptic excisions. 6,7 Circular excision has been shown to result in significantly shorter wound length than elliptical excision. 6,7 Also, one study of the optimal direction of wound closure in circular excision found this direction to be different from what was initially estimated in half the cases, thus enabling a better oriented wound closure line during the procedure.…”
Section: Factors Inuencing Cosmetic Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wounds on convex surfaces, similar to the rotator cuff footprint at the greater tuberosity, are more susceptible to this deformity. 21 Techniques used in plastic and dermatologic surgery to manage dog ear deformities, including fusiform excision, S-plasty, M-plasty, and V-excision, 2,[6][7][8]19,21,22 are not applicable to dog ear deformities in rotator cuff repairs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly encountered in other surgical wounds as well, dog ear deformities are the result of an asymmetric puckering or accumulation of tissue, typically in the center or at the apices of an incision. The etiology and management of these deformities are well described in the plastic and dermatologic surgery literature 2,6,7,19,21,22 ; however, there is a relative paucity of literature regarding the causes and implications of dog ear deformities in rotator cuff repairs. This study was performed to quantify the effects of dog ear formation on rotator cuff footprint restoration after repair as well as to assess the association between rotator cuff repair method and the formation and management of dog ear deformities in a human cadaveric model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%