Comparison of work environment and occupational injury in direct and indirect employment in Korea and Europe

Abstract

BackgroundTo investigate the risk of injury for indirect employment in Korea, we compared work environment, workplace exposure, and injury risk according to the type of employment contract between Korea and European Union (EU) countries.MethodsWe analyzed data of blue-collar workers from the fourth Korean Working Conditions Survey (2014) and the sixth European Working Conditions Survey (2015) and compared workplace risk factors and preventive factors for occupational injuries. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the relationship between occupational injury and the type of employment contract after adjusting for age and sex.ResultsFor descriptive characteristics, a relatively older age, lower income, lower proportion of full-time work, greater proportion in small-sized companies, and fewer unionizations were noted in indirect employment in Korea than in direct employment. Workplace exposure was significantly higher in indirect employment in both Korea and Europe. Among safety-related factors, indirect employment in both Korea and Europe lacked the support of company education, coworkers, and supervisors. Indirectly employed blue-collar workers had a significantly higher risk of occupational injury than those directly employed in Korea (odds ratio [OR]: 1.876), whereas there was no significant difference between directly and indirectly employed workers in EU countries (OR: 1.038).ConclusionsIndirectly employed blue-collar workers have an increased risk of occupational injury in Korea.

Shift Work and Dry Eye Disease in the Korean Working Population: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study

“…In most societies, the normal retirement age is 65 years [19]. Therefore, we surveyed populations excluding those 65 or over, like other studies in workers [20]. For sensitivity analysis, we conducted the same analysis in a study population including participants 65 years of age or older.…”

Prevalence of Occupational Injury among Workers in the Construction, Manufacturing, and Mining Industries in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

“…The present review's pooled prevalence rate of occupation-related injuries is much higher than that reported in different parts of the world. For instance, it is higher than the rate reported in Ethiopia [51][52], Korea [53], Mexico [54], Thailand [55], China [56], Turkey [57], Iran [58], and Malaysia [59]. Methodological variation in estimating the outcome of interest and the injury site (where the studies were done) may credit the potential explanations for the above interpretation.…”

The Occupational Characteristics and Health Status of Workers in Geographically Isolated and Confined Areas in the Republic of Korea

“…Small-scale workplaces also have risk factors associated with occupational injuries. 20 25 Small-scale workplaces generally have short working periods and high turnover rates. 26 27 Also, small-scale workplaces are operated only with small assets, thereby making investments in safety and health difficult.…”

“…19 Perceived health status was surveyed using a 5-point Likert scale, and ‘poor perceived health status’ was defined as ‘yes’ when the responses were ‘very poor’ and ‘poor,’ and was defined as ‘no’ when responses were “fair,” “good,” and “excellent.” The unmet medical needs were evaluated through the question “In the last one year, have you required hospital treatment but have not received it?”, and the answers were “Yes,” “No,” and “I have never needed a hospital examination.” Occupational injury was investigated through the questions “Over the last 12 months, did you suffer from any of the following health problems?” “Injuries (hurt by accident)?” and “Due to your job?”. 20 …”