2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-019-0318-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of wind turbine power curves using cup anemometer and pulsed doppler light detection and ranging systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous works (Kang et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2016;Shin et al, 2019;Tumenbayar & Ko, 2023), the same Windcube V2 as this work was used and it was observed that the coefficient of determination, R 2 , between met masts and the ground lidar wind speeds were ranged from 0.96 to 0.99. This indicates high accuracy of the lidar measurements.…”
Section: Data Accuracy Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our previous works (Kang et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2016;Shin et al, 2019;Tumenbayar & Ko, 2023), the same Windcube V2 as this work was used and it was observed that the coefficient of determination, R 2 , between met masts and the ground lidar wind speeds were ranged from 0.96 to 0.99. This indicates high accuracy of the lidar measurements.…”
Section: Data Accuracy Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lidar enables the capture of vertical wind profiles up to a height of 200 m, which is crucial for more accurate estimation of wind power production from modern large wind turbines (Leosphere, 2014). Extensive studies have been conducted to assess the measurement accuracy of ground-based lidar (Bodini et al, 2019;Shin et al, 2019), and high correlations between met masts and ground lidar measurements have been observed under various terrain conditions (Borraccino et al, 2017;Yan et al, 2022). Kim et al (Kim et al, 2016) found that ground lidar measurements exhibited an error of 2 % to 6 % in wind speeds under various terrain conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the data rejection criteria are clearly given for the met mast wind data in IEC 61400-12-2, no data rejection criteria are available for the nacelle LIAR measurements. Thus, the following nacelle LIDAR measurements and the concurrent data of the other sources were discarded according to suggestions from previous studies [28][29][30]34,35]:…”
Section: Ntf Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shin et al [28,29] clarified the reliability of the nacelle LIDAR measurements through comparison with the reference cup anemometer wind data. They also compared the power curves from the nacelle LIDAR, the cup anemometer and REWS measurements, which led to the conclusion that the nacelle LIDAR power curve was quite similar to the other power curves, with a relative error of less than 3.01% [30]. According to the demand for using nacelle LIDAR for power performance testing, the project team IEC 61400-50-3 was organized and has been working to publish the official international standard by the end of 2020 so that nacelle LIDAR can be used for wind turbine power performance testing without a met mast [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%