2006
DOI: 10.1577/m04-147.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of White Sucker Age Estimates from Scales, Pectoral Fin Rays, and Otoliths

Abstract: The ages of 229 white suckers Catostomus commersonii from six drainages in the upper Missouri River basin were estimated from scales, pectoral fin ray sections, and lapilli otolith sections to evaluate the potential bias of age estimates between structures. Age estimates were compared by calculating the coefficient of variation, average percent error, percent agreement, and percent agreement within 1 year, as well as by constructing age bias plots. Overall, the relative precision of age estimates from pectoral… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, although scales were historically used to age the white sucker (Catostomus commersonii), Beamish and Harvey (1969), after verifying yearly deposition of annuli, found that pectoralfin rays yielded older ages than did scales of individuals older than age 5. Later studies on white suckers found that fin rays yielded biased ages in the oldest individuals and that the otolith was the most appropriate structure (Thompson and Beckman, 1995;Sylvester and Berry, 2006). These examples show the importance of evaluating each structure for age determination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although scales were historically used to age the white sucker (Catostomus commersonii), Beamish and Harvey (1969), after verifying yearly deposition of annuli, found that pectoralfin rays yielded older ages than did scales of individuals older than age 5. Later studies on white suckers found that fin rays yielded biased ages in the oldest individuals and that the otolith was the most appropriate structure (Thompson and Beckman, 1995;Sylvester and Berry, 2006). These examples show the importance of evaluating each structure for age determination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otoliths were reported to be inferior to scales and vertebrae for age estimation in Leuciscus cephalus orientalis (Ozdemir and Sen 1986). Sylvester and Berry (2006) reported that otoliths were more accurate than scales and pectoral fin rays for age estimation in white sucker (Catostomus commersonii). Isermann et al (2003), while comparing the scales, sagittal otoliths, and dorsal spines, reported that otoliths provided the most timeefficient and precise approach for age estimation in walleye (Sander vitreum).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of age estimates between structures is an alterative technique to validation that may provide useful information on the accuracy and bias of ageestimating structures (Sylvester and Berry 2006). Several studies have focused on comparing ages enumerated from different bony structures in an attempt to quantify the precision and to identify possible bias associated with each structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most reliable method for estimating the age of white suckers is to use thin-sectioned otoliths [39]. Thus, we prepared thin sections for each of the otoliths and followed the procedures described by Edwards et al [40] to assign an age to each of the white suckers.…”
Section: Pcb Hg Methylmercury and Age Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%