2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-165x.2006.tb00134.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of white blood cell differential percentages determined by the in‐house LaserCyte hematology analyzer and a manual method

Abstract: Although use of a 100-cell (vs 200-cell) M-diff% may be a limitation of our study, good correlation between WBC differentials obtained using the LaserCyte and the manual method was achieved only for feline eosinophils.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Similar analyses on leukogram were previously reported in LaserCyte (IDEXX Laboratories) which was made up of laser flow cytometry [8]. Making a comparison between the present and previous studies, all analytes in leukogram on ProCyte Dx could provide better results than those on LaserCyte (neutrophils, r =0.55; lymphocytes, r =0.76; monocytes, r =-0.05; eosinophils, r =0.60) in canine blood [8].…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3). Similar analyses on leukogram were previously reported in LaserCyte (IDEXX Laboratories) which was made up of laser flow cytometry [8]. Making a comparison between the present and previous studies, all analytes in leukogram on ProCyte Dx could provide better results than those on LaserCyte (neutrophils, r =0.55; lymphocytes, r =0.76; monocytes, r =-0.05; eosinophils, r =0.60) in canine blood [8].…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similar analyses on leukogram were previously reported in LaserCyte (IDEXX Laboratories) which was made up of laser flow cytometry [8]. Making a comparison between the present and previous studies, all analytes in leukogram on ProCyte Dx could provide better results than those on LaserCyte (neutrophils, r =0.55; lymphocytes, r =0.76; monocytes, r =-0.05; eosinophils, r =0.60) in canine blood [8]. Although ProCyte Dx is thought to be a better analyzer, careful observation of blood preparations should be required, especially in cases with hematological abnormality, since leukogram by ProCyte Dx provides excellent results as the present study but may not be perfect, and morphological abnormality of blood cells cannot be recognized by the data.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences may also relate to striking interspecies differences in neutrophil content of blood, since neutrophils represent only a relatively very small proportion, 10–25%, of leucocytes in mice, whereas neutrophils are far more prevalent in dog and human blood, where they represent about 70% and 50–70% (respectively) of leucocytes [102], [103]. This is an important point since the much higher neutrophil levels in dogs (and humans), and the 35 fold increase of neutrophils in GRMD muscles, implies a much greater role for the adverse effects of neutrophils in the severity of dystropathology in dogs and humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is available with multiple preprogrammed settings for the commonest domestic species. Although comparative studies have been conducted between automated hematology systems and manual techniques using samples of most of the domestic species Science Publications AJAVS (Hennessy et al, 1998;Bienzle et al, 2000;Dawson et al, 2000;Papasouliotis et al, 2006;Roleff et al, 2007), such a comparison has not been made for ovine blood except for a comparison of blood samples from lambs collected into two types of vacutainer tubes, one containing EDTA and the other heparin (Vatn et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%