1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(92)90002-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of various flood frequency distributions using annual flood peaks data of rivers in Anatolia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The main problem with parametric simulation is that the parametric distribution of most hydrological variables is unknown and that the choice of the parent distribution usually is arbitrary. Although the robustness of the conclusions to the hypothesis of a given parent distribution may be studied Kuczera, 1982;Haktanir, 1992], parametric simulation has been criticized for comparing statistical models in an artificial setting [Klemes, 1986;Potter, 1987 …”
Section: Simulation In Statistical Hydrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main problem with parametric simulation is that the parametric distribution of most hydrological variables is unknown and that the choice of the parent distribution usually is arbitrary. Although the robustness of the conclusions to the hypothesis of a given parent distribution may be studied Kuczera, 1982;Haktanir, 1992], parametric simulation has been criticized for comparing statistical models in an artificial setting [Klemes, 1986;Potter, 1987 …”
Section: Simulation In Statistical Hydrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adamowski [8] studied probability density functions for oods in the Provinces of Ontario and Quebec, Canada. In Turkey, Haktanir [9], Sorman and Okur [10], Atiem and Harmancioglu [11], Saf [12], and Bayazit and Onoz [13] carried out Lmoments based RFFA. In recent years, Seckin et al (2011) showed that GEV and WAK distributions, whose parameters are computed by the L-moments method, are adequate in predicting quantile estimates in Turkey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Houghton (1978) is the first researcher to use this distribution for flood frequency analysis. Landwehr et al (1979a,b), Kumar and Chander (1987), Rao and Arora (1987), Haktanir (1992), Vogel et al (1993) and Haktanir and Horlacher (1993) are some of the others who employed the five-parameter Wakeby (W5) distribution for flood frequency analysis. While, in * Correspondence to: TekinÖztekin, University of Gaziosmanpasa, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Tasliciftlik Kampus, 60250 Tokat, Turkey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%