2003
DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2003101p69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two techniques for diagnosis of giardiasis in dogs

Abstract: Summary:Giardiasis is an intestinal parasitosis affecting dogs and able to infect human beings. Its diagnosis can not be done with the only clinical signs, the main of which is non characteristic diarrhoea. It implicates to perform further tests to detect the parasite. The zinc sulfate concentration technique |ZSCT| is the more effective one if performed on two or three successive days. Fecal ELISA kits have been developed to detect Giardia in humans and were found to be less sensitive than the ZSCT in dogs. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, DNA was amplified by PCR for one of the parasites even if the preceding parasitological tests were negative for that parasite. Other researchers have concluded that discordance among testing modalities is common (Decock, Cadiergues, Larcher, Vermot, & Franc, ; Dryden, Payne, & Smith, ; Geurden, Berkvens, Casaert, Vercruysse, & Claerebout, ; Leonhard, Pfister, Beelitz, Wielinga, & Thompson, ; McDowall et al, ; Olson et al, ), and that identifying and genotyping G. intestinalis can be challenging (Lebbad et al, ; Leonhard et al, ; McDowall et al, ), all of which may indicate that our prevalence estimates are likely underestimates. Our study highlights some of the realistic challenges that exist with collecting faecal samples in a remote Arctic locale, maintaining correct sample storage conditions and facilitating rapid analysis at a centralized southern laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, DNA was amplified by PCR for one of the parasites even if the preceding parasitological tests were negative for that parasite. Other researchers have concluded that discordance among testing modalities is common (Decock, Cadiergues, Larcher, Vermot, & Franc, ; Dryden, Payne, & Smith, ; Geurden, Berkvens, Casaert, Vercruysse, & Claerebout, ; Leonhard, Pfister, Beelitz, Wielinga, & Thompson, ; McDowall et al, ; Olson et al, ), and that identifying and genotyping G. intestinalis can be challenging (Lebbad et al, ; Leonhard et al, ; McDowall et al, ), all of which may indicate that our prevalence estimates are likely underestimates. Our study highlights some of the realistic challenges that exist with collecting faecal samples in a remote Arctic locale, maintaining correct sample storage conditions and facilitating rapid analysis at a centralized southern laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It demonstrates the need for the use, when possible, of a larger sample size, more precise and available molecular diagnostic tools (Gasser, 2006) and repeated sampling of the same individuals. Indeed, the probability of detecting Giardia by coprological analysis in infected individuals is greatly increased by sampling over several consecutive days (Leib et al., 1992; Decock et al., 2003). Bailenger’s method was used with the aim of improving sensitivity but it had the opposite effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copro-antigens of G. intestinalis and C. parvum were quantified on 100 mg of feces using respectively the ProSpecT-Giardia and the ProSpecT-Cryptosporidium Microplate Assay kit (Remel, France) (Decock et al, 2003;Mekaru et al, 2007;Rimhanen-Finne et al, 2007). An optical density value > 0.05 was considered positive according to the manufacturer's instructions.…”
Section: Intestinal Parasitesmentioning
confidence: 99%