Comparison of two species‐specific oscillometric blood pressure monitors with direct blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats

Abstract

Although both OBP monitors provide unacceptable SAP estimations, MAP values derived from both monitors and DAP measured by the petMAP result in acceptable agreement with the reference method according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (mean bias ≤ 5 mm Hg with LOA ≤ ± 16 mm Hg). Both monitors provide acceptable trending ability for SAP, DAP, and MAP.

Effects of intracameral injection of epinephrine and 2% lidocaine on pupil diameter, intraocular pressure, and cardiovascular parameters in healthy cats

“…In our study, cats that received epinephrine developed significantly higher MAP, in the first 20 minutes of evaluation, than the ones treated with both doses of lidocaine. However, the HR and MAP did not alter significantly with time and were within the physiological range for cats in all treatment groups . Similarly, intracameral injection of lidocaine and epinephrine did not alter cardiovascular parameter in dogs, and humans …”

“…However, the HR and MAP did not alter significantly with time and were within the physiological range for cats in all treatment groups. 17,19,31 Similarly, intracameral injection of lidocaine and epinephrine did not alter cardiovascular parameter in dogs, 14,24 and humans. [11][12][13] From our results, it can be concluded that the intracameral injection of 0.2 mL of 1:10 000 epinephrine and 0.2-0.3 mL of 2% lidocaine was able to significantly induce satisfactory mydriasis (>10 mm) without adverse effects on IOP, HR, and MAP in healthy cats.…”

Sağlıklı Kedilerde Duvara Monta ve Mobil Cihaz ile Ölçülen Kan Basıncı Değerlerinin Karşılaştırılması

“…A study on eight anesthetized cats done to investigate the accuracy of two different species-specific oscillometric blood pressure measuring devices reported that SBP (mmHg) values measured from the tail were higher than those measured from the front forearm extremity. In another study, the mean margin of error (mean bias: 7.2 mmHg and 10.9 mmHg) was also found to be higher for the measurements taken from the tail region comparatively (Cerejo et al, 2017). Similarly, in another study, where oscillometric BP measurements were carried out in conscious cats, it was stated that the mean BP values taken from the coccygeal artery were 8.7% higher than those taken from the radial artery (Cannon and Brett, 2012).…”

Non-invasive blood pressure measurement in ferrets ( Mustela putorius furo ) using high definition oscillometry

“…The maximum SD for NIBP measurements in ferrets obtained at the forelimb (except for DAP during hypertension) and at the tail for both individual pressure ranges, as well as the overall pressure range, met the criteria of the ACVIM guidelines, with values being comparable to those in cats (Cerejo et al, 2017) and lower than those in dogs and horses (Rysnik et al, 2013;Tünsmeyer et al, 2015). These findings suggest that BP measurements using the HDO device are highly reproducible, as was also demonstrated during study 3, in which the repeatability coefficient and ICCs for SAP, MAP and DAP showed excellent agreement between measurements.…”