2014
DOI: 10.7883/yoken.67.441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Methods of Bacterial DNA Extraction from Human Fecal Samples Contaminated with Clostridium perfringens, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Campylobacter jejuni

Abstract: SUMMARY:In this study, 2 methods of DNA extraction were evaluated for use in conjunction with the screening system Rapid Foodborne Bacterial Screening 24 (RFBS24), which employs multiplex realtime SYBR Green polymerase chain reaction (SG-PCR) and can simultaneously detect 24 target genes of foodborne pathogens in fecal DNA samples. The QIAamp DNA Stool mini kit (Qkit) and Ultra Clean Fecal DNA Isolation Kit (Ukit) were used for bacterial DNA extraction from fecal samples artificially inoculated with Clostridiu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The improvement of analytical characteristics of RFBS24 ver. 5 by Ukit may be attributed to highly efficient DNA extraction by disruption of bacterial cells via mechanical shearing, as reported previously (24). For Salmonella and Campylobacter infections, the results of the culture method and of our PCR assay for bacterial pathogens, except for the causative pathogens detected with RFBS24 ver.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The improvement of analytical characteristics of RFBS24 ver. 5 by Ukit may be attributed to highly efficient DNA extraction by disruption of bacterial cells via mechanical shearing, as reported previously (24). For Salmonella and Campylobacter infections, the results of the culture method and of our PCR assay for bacterial pathogens, except for the causative pathogens detected with RFBS24 ver.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…This consideration is true even for commercial DNA extraction kits. For example, when Kawase et al. (2014) compared two commercial fecal DNA extraction kits on human feces to pathogen DNA, they detected higher recovery of target genes and improved detection consistently with one kit versus the other.…”
Section: Real-time Quantitative Pcr (Qpcr) and Campylobactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the previous reports, the sensitivity of this SPE ECL assay is not the highest. 24 However, the signal amplication of ECL has been improved (dual signal amplication) and the assay process has been simplied. Thus, the adaptability for application in POCT is increased.…”
Section: Sensitivity Stability and Selectivity Of The Spe Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%