2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2009.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy techniques for total carbon measurement in soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Martin et al (2010) reported full cross-validation accuracy for a LIBS PLS1 TC calibration (SEP = 3.1g C kg -1 ) using soil samples from a single soil series in each of three states-not a geographically independent validation given that the samples were not selected to be geographically independent (Brown et al, 2005;Brown et al, 2006;Dardenne et al, 2000). Lastly, Belkov et al (2009) calibrated combined-and double-pulse LIBS to "homemade certified standards", then In this study, the research team was not able to explain SOC variance using LIBS (r 2 = 0.22, RPD = 1.1) even though the LIBS prediction error (SEP) for SOC was less than that for TC and IC (Table 3). Assuming a constant prediction error, r 2 and RPD will both increase with greater variation in the target variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin et al (2010) reported full cross-validation accuracy for a LIBS PLS1 TC calibration (SEP = 3.1g C kg -1 ) using soil samples from a single soil series in each of three states-not a geographically independent validation given that the samples were not selected to be geographically independent (Brown et al, 2005;Brown et al, 2006;Dardenne et al, 2000). Lastly, Belkov et al (2009) calibrated combined-and double-pulse LIBS to "homemade certified standards", then In this study, the research team was not able to explain SOC variance using LIBS (r 2 = 0.22, RPD = 1.1) even though the LIBS prediction error (SEP) for SOC was less than that for TC and IC (Table 3). Assuming a constant prediction error, r 2 and RPD will both increase with greater variation in the target variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the LOD achieved for Cr in soil was 46.2 mg/kg. The LOD for LIBS is higher due to relatively low sensitivity of the technique compared to ICP-MS and some other trace metals monitoring techniques [35,45].…”
Section: Limit Of Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of LIBS to soil [6,[24][25][26][27][33][34][35][36] and sediment [22,37,38] analyses has been of growing interest during the last decade. The LIBS technique has been mainly applied to solve two related problems of soil analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also performed classification by principal components analyses (Sirven et al, 2006). Belkov (Belkov et al, 2009) showed the possibility of measuring the carbon content in 11 soil samples. The calibration curve was fit by an exponential function within 2% to 8% range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%