2022
DOI: 10.1109/jeds.2022.3200520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two in Pixel Source Follower Schemes for Deep Subelectron Noise CMOS Image Sensors

Abstract: This paper compares two in-pixel source follower stage designs for low noise CMOS image sensors embedded both on a same 5 mm by 5 mm chip fabricated in a 180 nm CIS process. The presented chip embeds two pixel variants, one based on a body-effect-canceled thin oxide PMOS and the other embeds a native thick oxide NMOS. On the other hand they share the same sense node, same amplification circuit and 11 bit single slope analog to digital converter (SS-ADC). The imager characterization demonstrates a histogram pea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its sub-electron noise and high sensitivity allows for short integration times, for very low signals and this, without compromising the dynamic range. [20] The imager exploits an array of 5T pixels based on dual gate pinned-photodiodes paired with an optimized sense node doping profile and a low noise in-pixel source follower design. This, together with column level amplification and double sampling, ensures sub-electron read noise.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its sub-electron noise and high sensitivity allows for short integration times, for very low signals and this, without compromising the dynamic range. [20] The imager exploits an array of 5T pixels based on dual gate pinned-photodiodes paired with an optimized sense node doping profile and a low noise in-pixel source follower design. This, together with column level amplification and double sampling, ensures sub-electron read noise.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns may arise regarding the increased flicker noise caused by smaller gate geometries. As mentioned in Boukhayma et al [ 23 ], the smaller SF gate enhances the conversion gain and reduces input-referred noise, particularly when a fast CDS circuit is utilized. Another concern might be the potential occurrence of the hot electron effect in the absence of lightly doped drain (LDD) regions.…”
Section: Pixel Core Designmentioning
confidence: 99%