2012
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two in vivo measurements for skin surface topography

Abstract: Both measurement technologies provide reliable estimates indicating that skin surface measures of the volar forearm in young adults can differentiate between skin areas of different persons or different treatments in clinical studies. Skin surface topography of the volar forearm is comparable from distal to proximal assuring baseline comparability after randomization in clinical trials. SELS and PRIMOS roughness parameters of the volar forearm are not comparable and contain different types of information.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
39
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23 Roughness measurements were conducted in a controlled room temperature of 22 AE 2°C and 50% AE 10% relative humidity and after the participants' acclimatization for at least 30 min. The Visioscan® VC 98 camera and the corresponding software SELS 2000 (both Courage & Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) were used to measure the DIN/ISO parameters R z (arithmetic mean roughness from five consecutive sampling lengths) and R max (maximal roughness).…”
Section: Criterion Validation Of the Item "Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 Roughness measurements were conducted in a controlled room temperature of 22 AE 2°C and 50% AE 10% relative humidity and after the participants' acclimatization for at least 30 min. The Visioscan® VC 98 camera and the corresponding software SELS 2000 (both Courage & Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany) were used to measure the DIN/ISO parameters R z (arithmetic mean roughness from five consecutive sampling lengths) and R max (maximal roughness).…”
Section: Criterion Validation Of the Item "Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skin microrelief and its seasonal withered aspect are conveniently assessed using a series of dedicated noninvasive and scientifically validated methods [46]. One of these relies on the collection of negative replicas from the skin surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects of this study included healthy Japanese women between 25 and 35 y of age. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Kao Corporation in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (Approval number: [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In addition, subjects only participated after receiving a sufficient explanation of the purpose and content of the study and providing informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin surface profiles were measured using a Visioscan VC98 (Courage 1 Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Koln, Germany), which is commonly used to evaluate scaly skin (16). Two different variables, skin evaluation of scaliness (SESC) and skin evaluation Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%