Comparison of Two Differently Processed Acellular Dermal Matrix Products for Root Coverage Procedures: A Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Study

Wang, Hom Lay; Romanos, Georgios E.; Geurs, Nicolaas C.; Sullivan, Andrew; Amo, Fernando Suárez-López Del; Eber, Robert

doi:10.1902/jop.2014.140198

Cited by 35 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…5,6,13 Currently, the ADM is more routinely used for root coverage procedures (Fig. 2), [14][15][16][17][18][19] particularly when avoiding a second surgical site and minimizing patient morbidity is the primary concern. 2), [14][15][16][17][18][19] particularly when avoiding a second surgical site and minimizing patient morbidity is the primary concern.…”

Section: Decellularized Human Dermismentioning

confidence: 99%

Extracellular matrix‐based scaffolding technologies for periodontal and peri‐implant soft tissue regeneration

Tavelli

McGuire

Zucchelli

et al. 2019

Journal of Periodontology

111

155

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present article focuses on the properties and indications of scaffold‐based extracellular matrix (ECM) technologies as alternatives to autogenous soft tissue grafts for periodontal and peri‐implant plastic surgical reconstruction. The different processing methods for the creation of cell‐free constructs resulting in preservation of the extracellular matrices influence the characteristics and behavior of scaffolding biomaterials. The aim of this review is to discuss the properties, clinical application, and limitations of ECM‐based scaffold technologies in periodontal and peri‐implant soft tissue augmentation when used as alternatives to autogenous soft tissue grafts.

show abstract

Section: Decellularized Human Dermismentioning

confidence: 99%

Extracellular matrix‐based scaffolding technologies for periodontal and peri‐implant soft tissue regeneration

Tavelli

McGuire

Zucchelli

et al. 2019

Journal of Periodontology

111

155

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With regard to the impact of the graft processing procedure on the final clinical outcomes, it has been evaluated in two studies that were limited to management of isolated gingival recession [45,46]. In both studies, mean root coverage of 71-81% was reported, and the difference between freeze-dried ADM (AlloDerm®) and solventdehydrated ADM (Puros® Dermis, Zimmer) was not statistically significant.…”

Section: Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograftmentioning

confidence: 99%

Root Coverage Procedures for Multiple Recession Defects

Lai

Greenwell

2017

Curr Oral Health Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review The demand for root coverage in multiple gingival recession defects has increased in recent years. Compared to isolated recession, multiple gingival recession defects are much more challenging due to various limiting factors and require more sophisticated surgical techniques. This review aims to address recent progress in the management of multiple recession defects. Recent Findings The subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) procedure, while effective, is limited due to tissue availability and patient preference to avoid a donor harvest site. Different surgical techniques and biological materials have been studied in an attempt to find ideal alternatives. Summary Based on the studies reviewed, the SCTG procedure still remains the gold standard in terms of percent root coverage. Acellular dermal matrix allograft in conjunction with different flap designs has shown comparable, satisfactory results up to 1 year postoperatively. Other materials such as porcine collagen matrix and enamel matrix derivative also show some promise. Well-designed studies with long-term outcomes are still needed.

show abstract

“…In these defects, it has been suggested that SCTG is the gold standard for treatment, resulting in good clinical outcomes that are stable over time 9,16,20,21 . CAF with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) and ADM with CAF have also shown good clinical outcomes up to 10 years after surgery in Miller Class I and II defects 18,19,31 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Twenty‐five abstracts 2‐4,7,10‐30 were hand reviewed, and seven full articles 10‐13,16,17,29 were reviewed. Four articles 10‐13 are included in this study.…”

Section: Search Outcomementioning

confidence: 99%

Does Adjunctive Use of Growth Factors Improve Clinical Outcomes of Soft Tissue Grafting at Miller Class III Recession Defects? A Review of Current Evidence

Geisinger

Trammell²,

Holmes

et al. 2016

Clin Adv Periodontics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Focused Clinical Question In patients with gingival recession that is classified as Miller Class III, does adjunctive use of local growth factors with gingival grafting procedures improve clinical outcomes? Clinical Scenario A 31‐year‐old female presents with a chief complaint of gingival recession (GR) at teeth #4 to #13 (Fig. 1). Interproximal bone loss coronal to the level of the buccal GR is present. She is concerned about esthetics and would like to maximize her chance for complete root coverage. Her medical history is non‐contributory, and she has no contraindications to routine dental care. Because of the number of teeth involved and the difficulty in harvesting autogenous tissues, she is treated with acellular dermal matrix§ and enamel matrix derivative‖ with a coronally advanced flap at teeth #4 to #13 (Figs. 2 and 3). Final results reveal significant root coverage on all teeth and complete root coverage on teeth #7 to #10. This results in an esthetically acceptable result (Fig. 4).

show abstract

Comparison of Two Differently Processed Acellular Dermal Matrix Products for Root Coverage Procedures: A Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Study

Abstract: Both FDADM and SDADM can be used successfully to correct Miller Class I or II recession defects. There were no statistically significant differences between groups for any of the clinical parameters tested.

Cited by 35 publications

References 26 publications

Extracellular matrix‐based scaffolding technologies for periodontal and peri‐implant soft tissue regeneration

Extracellular matrix‐based scaffolding technologies for periodontal and peri‐implant soft tissue regeneration

Root Coverage Procedures for Multiple Recession Defects

Does Adjunctive Use of Growth Factors Improve Clinical Outcomes of Soft Tissue Grafting at Miller Class III Recession Defects? A Review of Current Evidence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About