1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199708)53:5<465::aid-jclp8>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two computational formulas for a WAIS-R seven subtest short form

Abstract: Several validity studies for a seven subtest WAIS-R short form have been conducted with patients from different populations as participants. All of these studies demonstrated high correlations between the short form IQ estimates and the actual VIQs, PIQs, and FSIQs (i.e., .90 to .98). In general, there also were small mean differences in the short form versus actual IQs across samples. There currently are two computational formulas for the seven subtest short form. The original weighted formula and a revised p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous findings (Iverson et al, 1997), there was no significant difference between summary scores derived from deviation quotients versus prorating. Internal consistency, alternate-forms reliability, comparisons of mean performance, and percentage of cases that fell within 5 or 10 points of the full WAIS-3 score all pointed to the same finding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to previous findings (Iverson et al, 1997), there was no significant difference between summary scores derived from deviation quotients versus prorating. Internal consistency, alternate-forms reliability, comparisons of mean performance, and percentage of cases that fell within 5 or 10 points of the full WAIS-3 score all pointed to the same finding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In a sample of patients with lateralized or diffuse lesions, the VIQ minus PIQ difference scores with the short form fell within 5 points of that of the full WAIS-R for 75% of the sample (Ryan, Abraham, Axelrod, & Paolo, 1996). Interestingly, the seven subtests included in this estimate of full WAIS-R performance were as equally effective when scaled scores were weighted differently as when they were given equal weights in prorating the sum of scaled scores (Iverson, Myers, & Adams, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%