2001
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/16.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of seven-subtest short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III in a referred sample

Abstract: The application of seven-subtest short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-3) was evaluated in a sample of 281 mixed clinical patients from three Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Short-form summary scores were derived from deviation quotient tables and from prorating. They included either Block Design or Matrix Reasoning. Short-form summary scores for Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) and Verbal IQ (VIQ) demonstrated good alternate-forms reliability with the full WAIS-3 scores, whereas Performance IQ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the WAIS-III protocols were scored in the standardized manner, the protocols were then rescored according to the procedures outlined in Axelrod et al (2001) and Pilgrim, Meyers, Bayless, and Whetstone (1999) for the seven-subtest short form of the WAIS-III. Two methods of scoring were chosen to account for the two methods of weighting the seven-subtest short forms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once the WAIS-III protocols were scored in the standardized manner, the protocols were then rescored according to the procedures outlined in Axelrod et al (2001) and Pilgrim, Meyers, Bayless, and Whetstone (1999) for the seven-subtest short form of the WAIS-III. Two methods of scoring were chosen to account for the two methods of weighting the seven-subtest short forms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two methods of scoring were chosen to account for the two methods of weighting the seven-subtest short forms. The method advocated by Axelrod et al (2001) prorates the scaled scores obtained from the administration of the WAIS-III to obtain the index and summary IQ scores. This was accomplished by summing the age-scaled scores for the verbal subtests (Information, Similarities, Arithmetic, Digit Span) and multiplying the resulting sum by 6/4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AI session was audio-recorded for later verbatim transcription, and it was scored following the standardized AI scoring procedure (see Levine et al, 2002, for a complete description of the scoring). (Axelrod, Ryan, & Ward, 2011;Wechsler, 1997) Nonverbal reasoning 9.00 (1.73) PM12 (Raven, 1958) Anterograde memory (verbal) 11.84 (1.34) RAVLT (Rey, 1964) 13.19 (2.01) Total mean number of words Delayed recall Anterograde memory (nonverbal) 35.20 (0.92) ROCF (Rey, 1941;Osterrieth, 1944) 24 (Shallice & Evans, 1978) 13.04 (2.87) Verbal Fluency (National Hospital) Categorical Phonological Information processing speed 53.85 (9.41) AMIBP subtest (Coughlan & Hollows, 1985) 49 Statistical analyses focused on the internal detail (i.e., strictly episodic detail) generated spontaneously by participants about the future events.…”
Section: Behavioral Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It comprised the following functions, general verbal abilities, tested with the Verbal IQ, short form [4] of the WAIS-111 [61], and nonverbal reasoning assessed using the Advanced Progressive Matrices Set 1 [41]. Anterograde memory was examined with the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT; [42]), and the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF; [36,43]).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Baseline Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%