Comparison of Two Anaerobic Water Polo-Specific Tests With the Wingate Test

Abstract

Usage of any items from the University of Cumbria's institutional repository 'Insight' must conform to the following fair usage guidelines.Any item and its associated metadata held in the University of Cumbria's institutional repository Insight (unless stated otherwise on the metadata record) may be copied, displayed or performed, and stored in line with the JISC fair dealing guidelines (available here) for educational and not-for-profit activities provided that• the authors, title and full bibliographic details of the item are cited clearly when any part of the work is referred to verbally or in the written form• a hyperlink/URL to the original Insight record of that item is included in any citations of the work • the content is not changed in any way• all files required for usage of the item are kept together with the main item file. You may not• sell any part of an item• refer to any part of an item without citation • amend any item or contextualise it in a way that will impugn the creator's reputation• remove or alter the copyright statement on an item.The full policy can be found here. Alternatively contact the University of Cumbria Repository Editor by emailing insight@cumbria.ac.uk. ABSTRACTThe purpose of the current study was to compare two water polo specific tests, the 14x25m swims (SWIM) and the 30-second crossbar jumps (30CJ) to a laboratory-based test of anaerobic power, the Wingate anaerobic power test (WAnT). Thirteen elite female water polo players (mean ± SD: age 22.0 ± 4.4 years, height 168.7 ± 7.9 cm, body mass 65.9 ± 6.1 kg, body fat 23.6 ± 3.5 %, maximum oxygen uptake 51.4 ± 4.5 ml•kg -1•min -1 ) participated in the study. The SWIM involved 14 repeated 'all-out' sprints every 30 seconds. Swimming time was recorded and sprint velocity, mean velocity (Vmean) and gradient of the linear regression equation (GRADIENT) were calculated. The 30CJ involved repeated in-water water polo jumps and touching the goal crossbar with both hands. The number of touches in 30 seconds was recorded. Additionally, the subjects completed a 30 second Wingate anaerobic power test and mean power (Mp) and fatigue index (FI) were calculated. Kendall tau (τ) rank correlation was used to examine for correlation between ranks. Significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05 No significant correlation was found between any of the measures of the WAnT and the two sport specific tests. It was suggested thatWAnT may not be an appropriate evaluation tool for anaerobic power assessment of water polo players, stressing the importance of sport-specific tests.

Influence of Acqua Lete® (Bicarbonate Calcic Natural Mineral Water) Hydration on Blood Lactate After Exercise

“…Many studies have used Wingate Test [15,16] and modified Wingate Test [17], to evaluate physiological responses to anaerobic exercise. In our study we evaluate the response to anaerobic exercise before and after hydration with a bicarbonate-calcic mineral water, named Acqua Lete, compared to very low mineral content water (dry residues 14.3 mg/L).…”

General Anthropometric and Specific Physical Fitness Profile of High-Level Junior Water Polo Players

“…While general fitness tests (i.e. general motor and/or endurance capacities) are important indices of overall fitness status and allow a comparison of athletes from different sports (Frenkl et al, 2001), specific fitness tests allow a more precise insight into sport-specific capacities and therefore provide a basis for comparing athletes in the same sport (Bampouras and Marrin, 2009; Holloway et al, 2008; Hughes et al, 2003; Sattler et al, 2011). However, there is a clear lack of studies dealing with specific physical fitness profiles in water polo and, in particular, we found no study which has investigated this problem among high-quality junior water polo players.…”

An Elliptical Trainer May Render the Wingate All-out Test More Anaerobic

“…Although some validity studies showed a good correlation between mechanical parameters measured during the WAT and strength, speed, power, or agility (13,24,28), other investigations reported an absence of relationship between these variables and/or the incapacity of the WAT to discriminate between elite and nonelite athletes (2,10,17,26,32). Consequently, these authors criticized the ecological validity of the WAT, referring in particular to the discrepancies in the movement patterns and/or muscular mass involved in the test compared with real competition.…”