2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00376-006-0001-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of TRMM and water district rain rates over New Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure high quality and continuity of observed rainfall data, a series of quality control and maintenance procedures were implemented, such as the preliminary visual inspection and a programming detection (see [8] for a detailed description). To further reduce the scale errors produced by direct comparison between the grid-scale satellite estimates and the point-scale gauge data, in this study we only selected gridboxes that contained at least three gauges and then used the mean value of all gauges inside each gridbox as the ground truth, as practiced by many previous studies [8][9][10][11][12]. Thus, thirty-two 0.25° × 0.25° gridboxes corresponding to the TRMM combined product pixel resolution were selected over the entire basin (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Study Area and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure high quality and continuity of observed rainfall data, a series of quality control and maintenance procedures were implemented, such as the preliminary visual inspection and a programming detection (see [8] for a detailed description). To further reduce the scale errors produced by direct comparison between the grid-scale satellite estimates and the point-scale gauge data, in this study we only selected gridboxes that contained at least three gauges and then used the mean value of all gauges inside each gridbox as the ground truth, as practiced by many previous studies [8][9][10][11][12]. Thus, thirty-two 0.25° × 0.25° gridboxes corresponding to the TRMM combined product pixel resolution were selected over the entire basin (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Study Area and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quantitative comparison, only the grids that cover two and more rain gauges have been used to compute the statistics metrics. Such a grid-based comparison technique has been reported in many previous studies [1,[27][28][29][30]. A total of 5086 gauge abnormal measurements were removed during the quality control.…”
Section: Statistics Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed that rain gauge measurements represent the precipitation truth within the corresponding pixel of satellite data. This kind of assumption is a common way to evaluate remote sensing products and has been widely applied by the remote sensing community [1,[27][28][29][30][31]. Considering that the TRMM products to be evaluated have the same spatio-temporal resolution, to better address the differences for these TRMM products, the uncertainty analysis associated with the NUBF effect has not been included in the current study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons by Chiu et al (2006) of TRMM retrievals (TRMM Precipitation Radar (PR), 2A25, TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI) 2A12, TRMM Combined Instrument (TCI) 2B31, TRMM 3B42, V5 & V6, TRMM, 3B43, V5 & V6) with Water District (WD) Rain-Gauge rates over New Mexico showed high biases for satellite-only algorithms. Merged satellite-gauge products (3B43 or 3B42) were found to be better correlated with WD gauge data.…”
Section: Review Of the Other Validation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%