2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.06.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of treatment options for removal of recalcitrant dissolved organic matter from paper mill effluent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Ciputra et al (2010) found that nanofiltration was generally superior to the use of an ion exchange resin or activated carbon adsorption for comprehensive polishing of recycling paper mill effluent.…”
Section: Membrane Polishing Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, Ciputra et al (2010) found that nanofiltration was generally superior to the use of an ion exchange resin or activated carbon adsorption for comprehensive polishing of recycling paper mill effluent.…”
Section: Membrane Polishing Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for high applied pressures generally can be avoided by use of a media filtration process that takes advantage of adsorption of the contaminant on solids having a suitably high surface area and affinity (Chen and Horan 1998;Pokhrel and Viraraghavan 2004;Ciputra et al 2010). Due to their very high surface area and generally hydrophobic nature, activated carbon products would be expected to be quite effective for removal of colored or hard-to-decompose aromatic compounds still present in water after other treatment stages.…”
Section: Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations