2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of treatment efficacy between hyaluronic acid and arthrocentesis plus hyaluronic acid in internal derangements of temporomandibular joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the WMD and SD of the continuous variables for meta-analyses. In one of the studies where the range and median were given 20 , the mean and standard deviation were estimated with statistical formulas 18 . In another study, the standard deviation for the preoperative and post-operative pain measurements (VAS) were not available 27 , therefore, pain measurements from that study were excluded from the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We used the WMD and SD of the continuous variables for meta-analyses. In one of the studies where the range and median were given 20 , the mean and standard deviation were estimated with statistical formulas 18 . In another study, the standard deviation for the preoperative and post-operative pain measurements (VAS) were not available 27 , therefore, pain measurements from that study were excluded from the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard deviation of the post-operative MMO and VAS were assumed to be the same as the pre-operative values. In 3 of the studies, arthrocentesis was performed as the initial treatment for TMDs [20][21][22][23] , in 2 of the studies, arthrocentesis was done within 3 months of failing conservative treatment 24,25 , and in 5 of the studies, arthrocentesis was performed after at least 3 months of conservative treatment [26][27][28][29][30] . Both random effects model and fixed effects models were used for construction of forest plots, due to the intention of generalization inference and the high heterogeneity found in the included studies, but also because of the small number of studies included in the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was also important that well-defined physical examination techniques such as the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) (36) or other validated techniques were used to identify the presence or absence of signs and symptoms that defined the patient sample. In our review of 31 published RCTs, some studies had no inclusion or exclusion criteria (2,14,33) or used a diagnosis of disk displacement with or without reduction as the inclusion criteria without reporting the exclusion of other pain sources such as masticatory muscle myalgia (3)(4)(5)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)15,17,18,(20)(21)(22)24,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32). Only a few RCTs confirmed the source of pain was from TMJ innervated structures by either the use of a local anesthetic to anesthetize the auriculotemporal nerve and eliminating the TMJ pain (6) or by selectively loading the TMJ by contralateral biting and duplicating the intracapsular source of pain within the joint (19).…”
Section: Identifying the Appropriate Patient To Test Tmj Arthrocentesis Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%