2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03261-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal three-dimensional echocardiography for assessment of atrial septal defect diameter in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Threedimensional transesophageal echocardiography and balloon sizing were adequately performed in 70 patients before the defect closure. The mean maximal diameter measured by 3D-TEE was 20 ± 15 mm (range [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] while the mean BSD was 22 ± 4.8 mm (range . When comparing the 3D-TEE and transcatheter measurements, there was a good correlation between the two methods (y = 3.15 + 0.77x; r = 0.8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Threedimensional transesophageal echocardiography and balloon sizing were adequately performed in 70 patients before the defect closure. The mean maximal diameter measured by 3D-TEE was 20 ± 15 mm (range [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] while the mean BSD was 22 ± 4.8 mm (range . When comparing the 3D-TEE and transcatheter measurements, there was a good correlation between the two methods (y = 3.15 + 0.77x; r = 0.8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D echocardiography demonstrated the great variability of the shape of the ASD as described before [30,32]. This variability might alter the accuracy of diameter and area calculation by 2D echocardiography and the measurement of the rim by 2D echo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…1) and the closure devices (Fig. 2), and has the ability to measure the maximal diameter and the systolic and diastolic areas of the defect [30,31]. This is a clear advantage of 3D echocardiography, because 2D echocardiography can not display the diastolic-systolic difference of the intraatrial defect area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 (with postprocessing) was shown to be comparable to 2D TEE in determining maximal ASD diameter in patients undergoing device closure of their defects. 24 More recently, real-time 3DE with a matrix array transducer has been shown to be a valuable additive modality for the diagnosis of congenital and acquired heart disease. 25 This new technique has allowed for real-time rendering of 3D images without the use of a rotational device and without lengthy postprocessing of images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%