2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three-dimensional rectosonography, rectal endoscopic sonography and magnetic resonance imaging performances in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasonographic study with 3D modalities has increasingly been employed for the evaluation of many gynecological diseases, being in recent years also investigated for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis [17][18][19]37]. Two previous studies prospectively compared the performance of 3D-RWC-TVS and MR with colorectal enema in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis, finding similar accuracy parameters, nevertheless stating the advantage of an accurate visualization and characterization of the nodules by performing the 3D evaluation [38,39]. In particular, 3D-RWC-TVS is characterized by a wide spatial orientation by providing the observer with a range of different displays of the images in the three orthogonal planes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ultrasonographic study with 3D modalities has increasingly been employed for the evaluation of many gynecological diseases, being in recent years also investigated for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis [17][18][19]37]. Two previous studies prospectively compared the performance of 3D-RWC-TVS and MR with colorectal enema in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis, finding similar accuracy parameters, nevertheless stating the advantage of an accurate visualization and characterization of the nodules by performing the 3D evaluation [38,39]. In particular, 3D-RWC-TVS is characterized by a wide spatial orientation by providing the observer with a range of different displays of the images in the three orthogonal planes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although MRI had slight advantages in terms of specificity and positive predictive value, it was not statistically significant. However, Amélie 33 has a different view. Amélie et al revealed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 3D transrectal ultrasound, EUS, and MRI were 94%, 100%, and 95%; 81%, 100%, and 84; and 90%, 100%, and 92%, respectively, for 37 patients who underwent surgical treatment at the same time.…”
Section: Diagnostic Value Of Eus In Benign Pelvic Masses With Colorec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, various imaging modalities have been recommended in the literature to diagnose and localize DIE, including transvaginal sonography (TVS), transrectal sonography (TRS) or rectal endoscopic sonography (RES), and MRI (4,5). Deeply infiltrating endometriosis in the uterosacral ligament, visceral wall, or pouch of Douglas (POD) (responsible for POD obliteration) is associated with serosal adhesion, fibrosis, and rectal DIE and can be identified via TVS (6,7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%