2020
DOI: 10.34172/aim.2020.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Different Therapies for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Identification of the Etiologic Isolates in Isfahan, Iran

Abstract: Background: In Iran, zoonotic and anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) are caused by Leishmania major and L. tropica respectively. Despite extensive studies, no effective therapies have ever been reported for CL. The main objective of this research was to determine and compare the three different protocols for treatment of CL patients referring to Skin Diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center (SDLRC), affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran from September 2017 to October 201… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, 42-168 days were used, when evaluating topical paromomycin, 4,35 and 30-180 days when evaluating meglumine antimoniate. 28 The negative PCR results evident in our study after 56 days provide further evidence to support the need for a long (2 months) treatment period with LAmB gel to achieve significant improvement from CL. We could not find in previous reports repeated PCR tests done in addition to the clinical follow-up, and this novel correlation further supports our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For example, 42-168 days were used, when evaluating topical paromomycin, 4,35 and 30-180 days when evaluating meglumine antimoniate. 28 The negative PCR results evident in our study after 56 days provide further evidence to support the need for a long (2 months) treatment period with LAmB gel to achieve significant improvement from CL. We could not find in previous reports repeated PCR tests done in addition to the clinical follow-up, and this novel correlation further supports our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Previous clinical studies designed to assess topical treatment for CL indeed set their endpoints timing to even more extended periods. For example, 42–168 days were used, when evaluating topical paromomycin, 4,35 and 30–180 days when evaluating meglumine antimoniate 28 . The negative PCR results evident in our study after 56 days provide further evidence to support the need for a long (2 months) treatment period with LAmB gel to achieve significant improvement from CL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations