2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three commercial RT-PCR systems for the detection of respiratory viruses

Abstract: In summary, these systems demonstrated excellent performance. Furthermore, each system has benefits which will ensure they will all have a niche in a clinical laboratory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are commercially available [6,7], but they usually require long assay times and a labor-intensive sampling process. Recently, testing of ribonucleic acid (RNA) viral cultures using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) has also become common, whereby viral nucleic acids extracted from samples are transcribed into complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) which is then amplified and analyzed by fluorescence or luminescence [8,9]. Despite the simplicity of this method, it cannot provide specific sequence information and produces higher false positive results arising from the amplification of non-specific sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are commercially available [6,7], but they usually require long assay times and a labor-intensive sampling process. Recently, testing of ribonucleic acid (RNA) viral cultures using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) has also become common, whereby viral nucleic acids extracted from samples are transcribed into complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) which is then amplified and analyzed by fluorescence or luminescence [8,9]. Despite the simplicity of this method, it cannot provide specific sequence information and produces higher false positive results arising from the amplification of non-specific sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular testing, such as PCR, is becoming the de facto gold standard for the detection of pathogens that are difficult to culture by offering high sensitivity and specificity and a rapid turnaround time (2). Syndrome-based multiplex molecular assays can detect up to 30 of the most common pathogens associated with respiratory infections, gastroenteritis, and central nervous system (CNS) infections (3)(4)(5)(6). However, the complete list of infectious agents associated with these infections greatly exceeds the capabilities of even the best multiplex assays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exact pipetting is not required, making peripheral use on an HSCT ward or an emergency department practical. Overall sensitivity is 97% for all tested pathogens with a low failure rate of 1% [16]. The literature gives a specificity of greater than 98% for all tested pathogens [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The method is expensive, however, and compared to conventional RT-PCR and other automated nested PCR-systems, Film Array has the highest costs per test [16]. Furthermore, simultaneous multiple sample testing with one instrument is not currently possible, requiring multiple instruments for a higher sample throughput.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%