2007
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in salivary gland fine-needle aspiration biopsies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is a large body of literature discussing findings in nongynecological specimens by TP, the literature on salivary gland FNA biopsies using this technique is extremely limited. As noted by previous reports [1,2,3], LBC introduces new artifacts that alter the cellular, architectural and extracellular matrix appearance (table 1). The authors emphasized the need for becoming familiar with those artifacts prior to full implementation of this new technology for patient care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While there is a large body of literature discussing findings in nongynecological specimens by TP, the literature on salivary gland FNA biopsies using this technique is extremely limited. As noted by previous reports [1,2,3], LBC introduces new artifacts that alter the cellular, architectural and extracellular matrix appearance (table 1). The authors emphasized the need for becoming familiar with those artifacts prior to full implementation of this new technology for patient care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This methodology has several advantages over conventional smears (CS), including the following: (1) more standardized processing, especially with samples received from outside clinics or shipped from a distance to centralized laboratories; (2) decreased screening area; (3) decreased obscuring material such as blood, inflammation and mucus; (4) lack of air-drying artifacts; (5) a more monolayer cellular surface that is easier to screen; (6) consistently well-preserved cells, and (7) the potential for automated screening in LBC specimens [1,2,3,4]. Because of the many advantages of LBC, the technique has been increasingly adopted by many laboratories for nongynecological specimens, particularly exfoliative samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LBC is increasingly applied to this scenario. Parfitt et al [22] evaluated salivary gland lesions with conventional smears and TP-prepared specimens with the following findings:…”
Section: Fine-needle Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Settings or specific diagnoses in which background material is critical to establishing the diagnosis (some sarcomas, salivary gland tumors, mucinous tumors) may be more difficult to accurately diagnose with TP. 2,9,10 The utility of TP in lung cytology has been addressed in few studies, and in these studies only a small number of cases were small cell carcinoma of lung (SCCL). [11][12][13] Thus, the utility and limitations of TP in the cytologic diagnosis of SCCL is still evolving.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%