2013
DOI: 10.1128/cvi.00089-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Vidas System and Two Recent Fully Automated Assays for Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Toxoplasmosis in Pregnant Women and Newborns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, adjusting the PPV in our study for epidemiological data is not possible, since prevalence and incidence data are not available for the various regions where the specimens were sent from. Laboratory testing for toxoplasmosis, including IgG, IgM, and IgG avidity, varies greatly by method and kit (23)(24)(25). Furthermore, the specificity of IgM has been found to vary from lot to lot even from the same manufacturer (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, adjusting the PPV in our study for epidemiological data is not possible, since prevalence and incidence data are not available for the various regions where the specimens were sent from. Laboratory testing for toxoplasmosis, including IgG, IgM, and IgG avidity, varies greatly by method and kit (23)(24)(25). Furthermore, the specificity of IgM has been found to vary from lot to lot even from the same manufacturer (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct detectionof T. gondii is difficult, therefore, most clinical laboratories use serological tests to detect antibodies against T. gondii, such as the latex agglutination test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) (7,8). Toxoplasmosis among pregnant women is a major concern in both developed and developing countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, ELFA detected more cases positive for IgM antibodies in G2 and more cases with IgG antibodies in G1. This higher positivity may be related to the fact that ELFA is an automated method; for some authors, automated methods are more sensitive and specific (Calderaro et al, 2008;Kasper et al, 2009;Maudry et al, 2009;Murat et al, 2013b;Petersen et al, 2005;Prusa et al, 2010;Rodrigues et al, 2009;Wilson et al, 1997). In this study, ELFA and ELISA had sensitivities of 100% for IgG, and 79.2% and 75.5% for IgM, respectively (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The results of qPCR are understandable as the result of serology suggests an acute infection, which is characterized by periods of parasitemia (Cordeiro et al, 2010). Moreover, qPCR is considered by some authors as a more sensitive technique with low risks of contamination (Homan et al, 2000;Lin et al, 2000;Murat et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%