2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12015-021-10264-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Variability of Small Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Human Liver Cancer Tissues and Cultured from the Tissue Explants Based on a Simple Enrichment Method

Abstract: A potential use of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes has recently generated a great interest. sEVs, when purified directly from various tissues with proper procedures, can reflect the physiological and pathological state of the organism. However, the quality of sEV is affected by many factors during isolation, including separation of sEV from cell and tissues debris, the use of enzymes for tissue digestion, and the storage state of tissues. In the present study, we est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2A1 and A2), which is consistent with the previously reported size range of the sEVs around 50–200 nm. 48 Besides, the concentrations of the sEVs from the OVCAR3 and A2780 cell lines were 1.5 × 10 8 particles per μL and 2.0 × 10 8 particles per μL, respectively (Fig. 2A1 and A2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2A1 and A2), which is consistent with the previously reported size range of the sEVs around 50–200 nm. 48 Besides, the concentrations of the sEVs from the OVCAR3 and A2780 cell lines were 1.5 × 10 8 particles per μL and 2.0 × 10 8 particles per μL, respectively (Fig. 2A1 and A2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Existing techniques for the isolation of small extracellular vesicles, such as ultracentrifugation and size exclusion, fail to achieve ideal purity and yield. In addition, characterization methods and storage stability are also important issues in the clinical application of sEVs [ 85 , 86 ]. Further, due to the heterogeneity of sEVs, specific tools for differentiating sEVs from different intracellular origins are under development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For bdsEVs separation, we used a Tumor Dissociation Kit, human (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-095-929) following the manufacturer's protocol. The isolation was reported as described previously (Vella et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2021;Crescitelli et al, 2021). The midbrain tissues were cut into small pieces and weighed (~200 mg) with a cryostat, then placed in 2.2 mL DMEM/F-12 medium (Gibco, C11330500BT) containing 100 μL Enzyme H, 50 μL Enzyme R, and 12.5 μL Enzyme A, and incubated at 37°C for 15 min.…”
Section: Separation Of Sevs From Midbrain Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%