2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the validity of three dental methods for the estimation of age at death

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
1
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
53
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Research indicates that dental development is under greater genetic control and less susceptible to environmental influences (Cunha et al 2009, Franklin 2010, Saunders 2000. In addition, dental tissues are highly mineralized and thus more resistant to postmortem alterations (De Luca et al 2010, Meinl et al 2008.…”
Section: Subsection One: Age Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicates that dental development is under greater genetic control and less susceptible to environmental influences (Cunha et al 2009, Franklin 2010, Saunders 2000. In addition, dental tissues are highly mineralized and thus more resistant to postmortem alterations (De Luca et al 2010, Meinl et al 2008.…”
Section: Subsection One: Age Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained regression equations appear to be very useful for making predictions about GA, with each model explaining a very high percentage of total variance ( Table 2). The use of conventional regression analysis to relate the indicator variable (in this study: the longitudinal length in long bones) with age (in this study: gestational age) involves a systematic bias in age estimation: there is a tendency to overestimate age in younger individuals, and to underestimate it in older individuals [22,23]. Claude Masset [24] suggested that this trend is related to the age distribution of the reference sample but it has been also proposed that the use of age as the dependent variable in the regression analysis weakens the estimates [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent testing of the method or modifications thereof could mostly not demonstrate the same success rates [5,[42][43][44][45]. In general, it was found to be more accurate in the middle to older age groups and root transparency had a better correlation with age than periodontal recession.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%