2020
DOI: 10.1134/s1070427220060026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Turbulent Drag Reduction Effectiveness of Polymers from Higher Olefin Monomers (Hexene, Octene, Decene, Dodecene) in the Production of Hydrodynamic Drag Reducing Agents for Transportation of Hydrocarbon Liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8-10 show 13 C NMR specters of the present polymers. In 13 C NMR of A1 polymer, the signal at 15 ppm is corresponding to methyl carbon (C1). While, signals at 22 ppm and 32 ppm were assigned to adjacent methylene carbon (C2) and (C3), respectively.…”
Section: C Nmr Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…8-10 show 13 C NMR specters of the present polymers. In 13 C NMR of A1 polymer, the signal at 15 ppm is corresponding to methyl carbon (C1). While, signals at 22 ppm and 32 ppm were assigned to adjacent methylene carbon (C2) and (C3), respectively.…”
Section: C Nmr Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer at frequency 100 MHz was also utilized to recorded 13 C NMR spectra. The solvent was CDCl3 and Fig.…”
Section: C Nmr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations