1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the traditional paper visual analogue scale questionnaire with an Apple Newton electronic appetite rating system (EARS) in free living subjects feeding ad libitum

Abstract: Objective: Assessing the value of a newly developed electronic visual analogue scale questionnaire (Apple Newton Message Pad) with the traditional paper method for appetite rating. Design: In a random, crossover design, subjects completed both electronic and paper questionnaires to compare results obtained by the two methods; individual methods were completed consecutively to assess test-retest reliability; preference was established using a questionnaire. Setting/Subjects: Healthy, free-living adults were stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
97
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of electronic monitoring of VAS has been validated and is well established. 32,33 The EARS has been used to continuously monitor subjective states in laboratory-based appetite studies (e.g., King et al 16 ) and in clinical studies using renal and obese patients (e.g., Wright et al, 34,35 Naslund et al 36 ). The EARS uses a handheld Psion computer to administer the VAS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of electronic monitoring of VAS has been validated and is well established. 32,33 The EARS has been used to continuously monitor subjective states in laboratory-based appetite studies (e.g., King et al 16 ) and in clinical studies using renal and obese patients (e.g., Wright et al, 34,35 Naslund et al 36 ). The EARS uses a handheld Psion computer to administer the VAS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 This scale was anchored at the low end with the most negative or lowest intensity feelings (for example, 'extremely unpleasant', 'not at all'), and with opposing terms at the high end (for example, 'extremely pleasant', 'very high', 'extreme') as described by Flint et al 17 Measurements were taken during the test day every 30 min from t ¼ 0-240 min, and every 15 min during infusion of emulsion (t ¼ 105-150 min).…”
Section: Satiety Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were collected using an electronic diary card (Apple Newton, Apple Computer Inc. Cupertino, California) as described by Stratton et al (1998). The questionnaire comprised six questions each corresponding to a 66 mm line divided into 100 points the computer could interpret.…”
Section: Hourly Hunger Ratingsmentioning
confidence: 99%