1997
DOI: 10.1159/000332531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Sensitivity of Sputum and Brush Cytology in the Diagnosis of Lung Carcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A point that claims our attention is that most of the studies routinely used fluoroscopy as guidance to increase the sensitivity of bronchoscopy. Few studies were conducted with non-guidance conventional bronchoscopy, and these were conducted for the cases confined to malignancies, those mixed with peripheral lung lesions visible bronchoscopically, and those performed with only brushing or washing 8,[21][22][23][24] . The bronchus sign on CT denotes the presence of a bronchus leading directly to a peripheral lung lesion 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A point that claims our attention is that most of the studies routinely used fluoroscopy as guidance to increase the sensitivity of bronchoscopy. Few studies were conducted with non-guidance conventional bronchoscopy, and these were conducted for the cases confined to malignancies, those mixed with peripheral lung lesions visible bronchoscopically, and those performed with only brushing or washing 8,[21][22][23][24] . The bronchus sign on CT denotes the presence of a bronchus leading directly to a peripheral lung lesion 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study revisiting 60 representative studies to assess the sensitivity of sputum cytology [27], an average sensitivity of 64.5% with a range of 22.0-98.1% was calculated. The reviewers9 own results showed a sensitivity of 40.3% for sputum cytology [27], which was comparable to earlier reports in the literature [5], but not as exceptionally high as the sensitivity of sputum cytology reported by BÖ CKING et al [28], who used a combination of cytology on three separate samples, quantitative cytometry and immunohistochemistry (paraffin-embedded sputum).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PIROZYNSKI [30] reported a sensitivity of 64% in a comparable study. Several authors describe the dependence of the sensitivity of cytologically investigated sputa and bronchial washings on tumour location and size [27,30]. A parallel investigation of endoscopic findings in 142 patients with suspected bronchopulmonary tumours showed the following growth patterns: 22% mainly submucosal tumour growth, 44% exophytic tumours localized in the visual range, 11% peripheral lesions not visible with bronchoscopy [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When permitted by material adequacy, a panel of commercially available antibodies against keratins (AE1/3) (dilution 1:100), calretinin (1:100) and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) (1:100) was applied on archival Papanicolaou-stained smears following the directions published elsewhere. 5,6 Paraffin sections from biopsy specimens were also stained for the same antigens; in addition, testing for keratin 5/6 (1:200), vimentin (1:100) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (1:50) was carried out. Antibody against AE1/3 was purchased from Dako (Santa Barbara, California, U.S.A.), calretinin from Zymed (South San Francisco, California, U.S.A.) and the remainder from BioGenex (San Ramon, California, U.S.A.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%