1990
DOI: 10.1016/0098-1354(90)80022-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the results obtained with different models for the simulation of preparative chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methods, by which to calculate solutions of Eq. 3, are available; yet, they yield similar results (Czok and Guiochon, 1990b).…”
Section: U -+ F F -+ + = D D -mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Other methods, by which to calculate solutions of Eq. 3, are available; yet, they yield similar results (Czok and Guiochon, 1990b).…”
Section: U -+ F F -+ + = D D -mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Symbols and lines same as in Figure 6. equilibrium model and the finite difference algorithm, previously used to calculate the solutions of this model because its computing time is much shorter (Czok and Guiochon, 1990). For reasons discussed elsewhere (Golshan-Shirazi and Guiochon, 1992b), this third profile is slightly steeper than the one obtained with the finite element method.…”
Section: Aq = L66mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…1 with 0, = 0 (ideal model). The values of the time and length increments of the integration are chosen to provide a numerical dispersion exactly equal to the desired apparent dispersion (Czok and Guiochon, 1990).…”
Section: Band Pro File Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%