“…Traditionally, the subject of settings determination for directional overcurrent protection elements have focused on the problem of ensuring selectivity by proposing basic to advanced techniques for the proper coordination of these elements in transmission and distribution networks [4][5][6][7], thus leaving the definition of direction determination settings, such as the Relay Characteristic Angle (RCA), or the limits of directional regions (forward and reverse) to general guidelines and typical values [4], which, from the author's practical experience, have resulted, in some cases, in non-selective tripping for faults outside of the protected line, or non-tripping for certain fault conditions within the protected line, without performing further analysis oriented to evaluate the performance of the general settings criteria. Even in recent years, few publications [7][8][9][10][11] have been made on the subject of proposing settings or evaluating its performance in directional overcurrent elements based on fault simulations; however, they deal with very specific application problems of directional overcurrent elements, such as underground cable systems [7] or mutually-coupled transmission lines [9], cross country faults in medium voltage loops [10], and the impact of fault current limiters and wind turbines on the direction determination algorithms [11], without addressing the problem related to the determination or evaluation of the settings defining the performance of the direction determination algorithm. In [7], although a very basic performance analysis is presented for directional phase and ground overcurrent elements, the settings used and verified are the typical values recommended in the specialized literature, and therefore, its selection is not justified, besides the fact that the simulations performed do not consider some of the most influencing factors affecting the performance of these protection elements, in part, due to the specific application to which the proposed methodology is applied.…”