2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06077-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the performance of four staging systems in determining the prognosis of breast cancer among women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among molecular cancer subtypes, luminal B corresponded to 52.2% of the cases, followed by triplenegative at 19.1%, luminal A at 17.8 % and HER2 at 7.8%. In Brazil, luminal subtype B is the most frequent subtype [16,22,23]. However, different incidences between the ve regions of the country are noted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among molecular cancer subtypes, luminal B corresponded to 52.2% of the cases, followed by triplenegative at 19.1%, luminal A at 17.8 % and HER2 at 7.8%. In Brazil, luminal subtype B is the most frequent subtype [16,22,23]. However, different incidences between the ve regions of the country are noted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superior performance of CPS + EG or Neo-Bioscore over PS and CS has been demonstrated in the American and Japanese breast cancer patients receiving NAC (4,5). However, the PS, CPS + EG, and Neo-Bioscore staging systems were proven to be equivalent in predicting Brazilian patients' prognosis (6). Another study based on a Chinese population also did not observe the advantages of CPS + EG and Neo-Bioscore over PS (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%