2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3075-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Outcomes of Endoscopic Ultrasound Based on Community Hospital Versus Tertiary Academic Center Settings

Abstract: Cytological yield of EUS-FNA in a community hospital is similar to that of a tertiary hospital. Community hospitals can provide EUS services with reasonable success.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 40 studies included, 11 studies with a total of 2127 patients were multicenter studies . The post‐EUS‐FNA adverse event morbidity in these studies (2.74%, 95% CI: 1.54–4.26%) was comparable to that in the 29 single‐center studies (2.63%, 95% CI: 1.58–3.95%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 40 studies included, 11 studies with a total of 2127 patients were multicenter studies . The post‐EUS‐FNA adverse event morbidity in these studies (2.74%, 95% CI: 1.54–4.26%) was comparable to that in the 29 single‐center studies (2.63%, 95% CI: 1.58–3.95%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…An analysis of the potential risk factors for adverse events after EUS‐FNA is presented in Table . Pooled data from 19 prospective studies showed a post‐EUS‐FNA adverse event morbidity of 3.69% (95% CI: 2.22–5.54%), whereas in the 21 retrospective studies the post‐EUS‐FNA incidence of adverse events was 1.90% (95% CI: 1.05–2.98%). There was no significant difference between prospective and retrospective studies in this respect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Community hospitals generally are smaller, but closely aligned with the community. 18 Although patient mix is often cited as an advantage in university-based programs, community settings can certainly provide excellent clinical exposure. One study 19 showed that family medicine residents saw similar numbers of patients and a breadth and depth of diagnoses in a university and a community hospital, while another study 20 demonstrated that pediatrics residents assigned to continuity clinics in communitybased ambulatory settings saw a higher number of patients, including more patients with chronic illnesses, and more patients seeking health supervision, compared to residents in a hospital-based practice.…”
Section: Perceived Differences Between the 2 Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,20 In the current analysis, 22 and more recent studies. 20,[23][24][25][26][27][28] However, the reported impact of ROSE varies. In a meta-analysis, ROSE increased specimen adequacy rate by 12% overall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%