1989
DOI: 10.1364/ao.28.003246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the NIST SURF and argon miniarc irradiance standards at 214 nm

Abstract: Comparison of NIST's SURF-II primary irradiance standard and argon miniarc irradiance standard at 214 nm with an uncertainty of ~3% shows that at this wavelength these irradiance standards agree to within the uncertainties of 1.3 and 7%, respectively, assigned to them by NIST.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NIST Ultraviolet Spectroradiometer is one of several double monochromators that were designed and built for NIST in the early 1980s [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. The design uses a 1/8 m Fastie-Ebert monochromator with mirror and grating blanks of Zerodur to assure thermal stability.…”
Section: Instrument Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NIST Ultraviolet Spectroradiometer is one of several double monochromators that were designed and built for NIST in the early 1980s [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. The design uses a 1/8 m Fastie-Ebert monochromator with mirror and grating blanks of Zerodur to assure thermal stability.…”
Section: Instrument Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wavelength of the recorded signal depends on the orientation of the grating; the strength of the recorded signal depends on many factors pertaining to the radiation source (the magnitude, polarization, and direction of the emitted rays), to the spectrometer (the dependence of the responsivity on the magnitude, polarization, and direction on the incident rays), and to certain environmental conditions (such as the presence of external stray radiations, temperature, and the diffracting medium). Becaiase laboratory UV irradiance sources used for instrument calibration purposes may be quite different, radiometrically, from the Sun, the dependence of the instrument signal on these radiometric differences must be thoroughly characterized so that calibration errors arising from these differences are minimized and can be evaluated [Kostkowski et al, 1986;Lean et al, 1989]. Differences in relative spectral distributions and flux magnitude are illustrated in Figure 5.…”
Section: Radiometric Characterization Of Susim-uarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectroradiometer used for this spectral irradiance comparison had a 0.125 m f/4.7 Fastie-Ebert double monochromator. This monochromator was described previously in the two prior source comparisons at SURF [ 10 , 11 ] and the instrument was reconfigured for this comparison with a new computer control and data acquisition system, detectors, electronics, and foreoptics. The monochromator was equipped with a 3600 groove per millimeter replica ruled grating blazed at 100 nm, and the entrance and exit slits were 5 mm in height and 0.55 mm in width, which produced a spectral bandpass of approximately 1 nm.…”
Section: Spectroradiometermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This intercomparison produced anomalous results in which UV spectral irradiance measurements performed by the different laboratories disagreed with each other by 5 % to 10 %. The NIST scales of UV spectral irradiance have been compared previously: SURF II irradiance was compared with tungsten-halogen standards [ 9 ] and with an argon miniarc [ 10 ]. The spectral irradiance comparison of SURF II with tungsten-halogen lamps was done at two wavelengths (254 nm and 297 nm) and agreement between the spectral irradiances was on the order of 1 %, well within the relative combined standard uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%