2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-017-0768-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the neuroprotective effects of brimonidine tartrate and melatonin on retinal ganglion cells

Abstract: Our study revealed that systemic administration of BRT also has an IOP reducing effect. MEL has no neuroprotective effect on RGCs; on the other hand, BRT acts as a neuroprotective agent against glaucomatous injury, when applied systemically.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiencies of these tracers for the retrograde labeling of RGCs have been confirmed in previous studies [ 31 , 39 41 ]. However, their relative advantages and disadvantages remain unclear, which may lead to their inappropriate application.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The efficiencies of these tracers for the retrograde labeling of RGCs have been confirmed in previous studies [ 31 , 39 41 ]. However, their relative advantages and disadvantages remain unclear, which may lead to their inappropriate application.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Brimonidine is an α2 adrenergic agonist with extensively documented neuroprotective effects in a variety of models of retinal disease (see for instance Guo et al, 2015; Marangoz et al, 2018). In addition, in retinas of rats with STZ-induced diabetes, it has been reported to induce a significant decrease of VEGF expression and of BRB breakdown to levels similar to those observed in control rats (Kusari et al, 2010).…”
Section: Other Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many controversial studies on brimonidine and its effects to preserve retinal tissue. Some non-clinical findings have demonstrated that brimonidine possess retinal protective action ( Lambert et al, 2011 ; Nizari et al, 2016 ; Marangoz et al, 2018 ). However, to date, clinical trials have failed to translate into similar efficacy in humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%