1993
DOI: 10.1021/j100142a040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the macrocyclic effect for ether hosts in aqueous and organic solvents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between our surface and all literature values range between (9 and À2) kJ AE mol À1 , and the average of these differences is 0.9 kJ AE mol À1 . Values of ðD r H m ; T Þ at m* = 0 that we obtained from our results are given in table 8. Figure 8 shows the (log Q, m, T) surface for reaction (3) calculated with the vanÕt Hoff equation using the D r H m shown in figure 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The differences between our surface and all literature values range between (9 and À2) kJ AE mol À1 , and the average of these differences is 0.9 kJ AE mol À1 . Values of ðD r H m ; T Þ at m* = 0 that we obtained from our results are given in table 8. Figure 8 shows the (log Q, m, T) surface for reaction (3) calculated with the vanÕt Hoff equation using the D r H m shown in figure 7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Because reaction (3) is isoelectric, we have assumed that Q = K and D r H m ¼ D r H m at all m t at T* = 298.15, and we used log K = (2.042 ± 0.006) (± standard deviation of the mean) and D r H m = (À25.57 ± 0.53) kJ AE mol À1 (± standard deviation of the mean). These values are the average of four literature values for reaction (3) obtained by calorimetry with Cl À as the anion [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations